Upload your Business Management Extended Essay EE draft and get instant feedback aligned with official IB criteria.
Follow the same rubric-first flow students use to move from a raw draft to a submission-ready version.
Start by dropping in your coursework PDF. We built this flow to mirror how students prepare final submission drafts.
Drag and drop to upload
Limit 10 MB per file. Supported files: PDF
Sign in to start your first grading run.
Marksy maps your draft against the rubric so you can see where marks are gained or lost in each criterion.
Every important scoring decision is anchored to your writing so revision is evidence-based, not guesswork.
Get structured next actions so you can move from draft to stronger markband performance in the right order.
For class-wide workflows, the same logic extends to batch marking so feedback stays consistent across submissions.
Keep one grading system across IA, EE, TOK, and subject variants so your preparation process stays consistent.
This structure keeps the essay focused on the question, the evidence disciplined, and the argument clearly evaluated.
Recommended Length
3,500-4,000 words
Build Timeline
10-12 weeks: question, sources, draft, revise, polish
Anchor Question
Can each section sustain the research question with evidence and balanced evaluation?
Want a full playbook format? Read Business Management EE Guide.
Use each criterion as a checklist for revision. Strong drafts make the scoring evidence obvious, not implied.
Examiner focus: This criterion assesses the topic, research question, methodology, and context of the business situation.
Top-band move: The essay begins with a clear outline of the topic, establishing the purpose of the research. The research question is precisely formulated to address a business problem or issue worthy of investigation, and it is answerable within the constraints of resources, time, and word limit. The methodology and approach to address the research question are carefully planned and outlined.
Common penalty: The topic is broad or generic. The research question is poorly formulated or difficult to answer. The methodology is weak or not clearly outlined. The business context is vaguely defined.
Examiner focus: This criterion assesses the student's understanding of the topic, use of terminology, and application of business and management models.
Top-band move: Source material is applied in a manner that directly relates to the research question. Technical or subject-specific terms are explained and used correctly, demonstrating the student's knowledge and understanding, while maintaining an analytical and academic tone. The student utilizes the sources to contextualize their topic within a broader business context.
Common penalty: The essay demonstrates a limited understanding of the topic. Terminology is used sparingly or inappropriately. Business and management models are superficially applied.
Examiner focus: This criterion assesses the student's research, analysis, discussion, and evaluation skills, including the use of business theories, tools, and techniques.
Top-band move: The student meticulously selects sources that directly contribute to addressing the research question, facilitating the formation of a well-supported argument and conclusion. Integrated use of research and business theories, tools, and techniques strengthens the development of arguments throughout the essay. The student critically assesses various perspectives on the topic, identifying both strengths and limitations. Culminating conclusions are formulated towards the end of the essay, summarizing the student's response to the research question and supported by evidence. The student provides commentary on the quality, balance, and quantity of the sources used and suggests avenues for further research to address unresolved issues.
Common penalty: The essay demonstrates limited research, analysis, discussion, and evaluation. Business theories, tools, and techniques are superficially applied. Arguments are weak and unsupported.
Examiner focus: This criterion assesses the structure, layout, referencing, and overall clarity of the essay.
Top-band move: The essay begins with a title page and a table of contents, adhering to standard formatting conventions. The structure of the essay follows the expected conventions for the topic, ensuring clarity and coherence in the presentation of arguments. Graphs, figures, or tables are appropriately labeled with numbers and brief descriptions and maintain good graphical quality.
Common penalty: The essay has a basic structure, but the layout is inconsistent. Referencing is attempted but contains errors.
Examiner focus: This criterion assesses the student's research focus, planning, and process, based on submitted reflections.
Top-band move: The RPPF form showcases the individual's progress and active involvement in the writing process. The student outlines the skills acquired during the extended essay writing journey. Challenges faced during the process are described in detail, along with the strategies employed to address them. The document reflects the personal significance and relevance of the work undertaken.
Common penalty: Reflections are superficial and provide limited insight into the research focus, planning, and process.
Match your draft to the descriptors below to identify the smallest edits that can move you into a higher band.
Points 0
The essay lacks a clear topic, research question, or methodology. The business context is not established.
Points 1-2
The topic is broad or generic. The research question is poorly formulated or difficult to answer. The methodology is weak or not clearly outlined. The business context is vaguely defined.
Points 3-4
The topic is reasonably focused. The research question is adequately formulated and answerable. The methodology is planned and outlined. The business context is described.
Points 5-6
The essay begins with a clear outline of the topic, establishing the purpose of the research. The research question is precisely formulated to address a business problem or issue worthy of investigation, and it is answerable within the constraints of resources, time, and word limit. The methodology and approach to address the research question are carefully planned and outlined.
Points 0
The essay demonstrates a lack of understanding of the topic. Terminology is not used or is used incorrectly. Business and management models are not applied.
Points 1-2
The essay demonstrates a limited understanding of the topic. Terminology is used sparingly or inappropriately. Business and management models are superficially applied.
Points 3-4
The essay demonstrates a good understanding of the topic. Terminology is used correctly. Business and management models are applied, but the connection to the research question could be stronger.
Points 5-6
Source material is applied in a manner that directly relates to the research question. Technical or subject-specific terms are explained and used correctly, demonstrating the student's knowledge and understanding, while maintaining an analytical and academic tone. The student utilizes the sources to contextualize their topic within a broader business context.
Points 0
The essay lacks research, analysis, discussion, and evaluation. Business theories, tools, and techniques are not used.
Points 1-4
The essay demonstrates limited research, analysis, discussion, and evaluation. Business theories, tools, and techniques are superficially applied. Arguments are weak and unsupported.
Points 5-8
The essay demonstrates adequate research, analysis, discussion, and evaluation. Business theories, tools, and techniques are applied, but the analysis could be more in-depth. Arguments are reasonably supported.
Points 9-12
The student meticulously selects sources that directly contribute to addressing the research question, facilitating the formation of a well-supported argument and conclusion. Integrated use of research and business theories, tools, and techniques strengthens the development of arguments throughout the essay. The student critically assesses various perspectives on the topic, identifying both strengths and limitations. Culminating conclusions are formulated towards the end of the essay, summarizing the student's response to the research question and supported by evidence. The student provides commentary on the quality, balance, and quantity of the sources used and suggests avenues for further research to address unresolved issues.
Points 0
The essay lacks a clear structure and layout. Referencing is missing or inaccurate.
Points 1
The essay has a basic structure, but the layout is inconsistent. Referencing is attempted but contains errors.
Points 2
The essay has a clear structure and layout. Referencing is mostly accurate.
Points 3-4
The essay begins with a title page and a table of contents, adhering to standard formatting conventions. The structure of the essay follows the expected conventions for the topic, ensuring clarity and coherence in the presentation of arguments. Graphs, figures, or tables are appropriately labeled with numbers and brief descriptions and maintain good graphical quality.
Points 0
Reflections are missing or do not address the research focus, planning, and process.
Points 1-2
Reflections are superficial and provide limited insight into the research focus, planning, and process.
Points 3-4
Reflections demonstrate a reasonable understanding of the research focus, planning, and process.
Points 5-6
The RPPF form showcases the individual's progress and active involvement in the writing process. The student outlines the skills acquired during the extended essay writing journey. Challenges faced during the process are described in detail, along with the strategies employed to address them. The document reflects the personal significance and relevance of the work undertaken.
Step 1
Keep the topic specific enough to support analysis, but broad enough to find credible business evidence.
Step 2
Use company data, market evidence, and theory only when each source advances the argument.
Step 3
Move beyond description by weighing outcomes, limitations, and alternative interpretations.
Step 4
Confirm that focus, knowledge, critical thinking, presentation, and engagement are all visible in the final draft.
The research question is narrow, focused, and answerable.
The terminology and concepts are accurate and used consistently.
The analysis and evaluation are sustained, not just appended at the end.
Presentation and reflection meet the expected essay standards.
Draft the conclusion early to expose weak sections fast.
Label every source by the job it does in the argument.
Add one sentence per paragraph that explicitly links back to the question.
The grader evaluates your submission against the active IB criteria for Business Management Extended Essay and returns criterion-level marks with actionable feedback.
Yes. Most students use draft grading to identify weak criteria, revise, and re-check before final submission.
Yes. Teachers can upload multiple files in one batch from the bulk grading route for faster class-wide feedback.
Absolutely. By default, nobody other than you can access your uploaded files, however you may make them shareable to others. Even then, you have full control to delete your files at any moment, and your files are not used to train AI models. More information here.
Upload a single submission and get criterion-by-criterion feedback aligned to IB descriptors.
Open Single GradingProcess up to 15 files in one run and keep feedback consistent across your class.
View Bulk Plan