What is ChatGPT?
ChatGPT is a general-purpose AI assistant used for writing and study support across many domains, including IB tasks when configured with user prompts.
Source freshness: dated public claims, last updated .
Do you want to know wether ChatGPT or Kognity is best for IB? This page provides a through comparison of both tools.
Last updated:
ChatGPT is a general-purpose AI assistant used for writing and study support across many domains, including IB tasks when configured with user prompts.
Kognity provides digital IB textbooks, classroom assignments, and progress data for schools, teachers, and students.
| Feature | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| General | |||
IB oriented ?IB-specific tools need less setup than a blank chat box. | Strong?Made specifically for grading and improving IB work. | ×No?General assistant, not IB-specific by default. | Strong?Explicit IB DP product positioning and collaboration claims. |
Affordable ?Shows what users actually pay, including per-review and billed-total caveats. | Strong?$0 entry with 5 full gradings/month, then paid student plans from $14.99/month. | ~Partial?Free tier is available, with paid plans publicly listed around Plus ($20/month) and Pro ($200/month). | ×No?No fixed self-serve public sticker price; schools are usually quoted custom annual contracts. |
Has free tier ?Students can start immediately without procurement or upfront payment. | Strong?5 complete gradings monthly on free access. | Strong?Public free plan exists with paid upgrades for higher limits and models. | ~Partial?Free access trial path exists, but full use is school subscription-led. |
Transparent pricing ?Lower uncertainty at evaluation time. | Strong?Public monthly pricing with free, student, and teacher tiers. | Strong?Public plan structure (Free/Plus/Pro/Business/Enterprise) is listed. | ?Unclear?Pricing is per-student per-year but final costs are quote-based. |
| Coursework grading | |||
IA / EE / TOK grading support ?Made for IAs, Extended Essays, TOK, and other IB coursework. | Strong?Grades IA, EE, and TOK drafts. | ~Partial?Can discuss many task types, but each one needs the right prompt. | ×No?Dedicated IA, EE, and TOK grading is not advertised. |
Marks by criterion ?Criterion-by-criterion marks and feedback, not generic advice. | Strong?Shows estimated marks and feedback for each assessment criterion. | ~Partial?Can grade with prompts, but IB rubric fidelity depends on user setup. | ×No?The public site does not clearly show marks by coursework section. |
AI detection ?Integrity checks are native, not a separate purchase. | Strong?20-50 paid-tier AI checks monthly. | ×No?No first-party academic AI-detection checker in ChatGPT product flows. | ×No?No public AI-detection check is advertised. |
Specific tips ?A clear list shows students what to fix first. | Strong?Pairs comments with a short list of changes to make next. | ×No?Students must prompt it to return a useful list of specific fixes. | ×No?No dedicated list of draft-specific fixes is advertised. |
Quick ?Fast feedback leaves time to edit and check another version. | Strong?Fast feedback leaves time to edit and check another version. | Strong?Most text responses appear immediately. | ×No?Not positioned as a quick grading-feedback product. |
Human review ?Human review can help edge cases but usually adds time and cost. | ×No?Uses AI feedback rather than a human examiner review. | ×No?Not an examiner review marketplace. | ×No?Not positioned as an examiner-review marketplace. |
Good price for grading drafts ?The cost of checking several drafts matters more than one review. | Strong?Subscription pricing keeps repeated retries cheaper than per-review models. | ×No?The subscription is not priced specifically for grading coursework. | ×No?School-led annual contracts can be heavy for individual grading-focused use. |
| Textbooks and simulations | |||
Online textbooks ?Useful for understanding a topic before working on coursework. | Strong?Includes online textbook chapters as well as draft grading. | ×No?No official IB textbook or revision library bundled by default. | Strong?Digital IB textbook and classroom content are core pillars. |
Hundreds of simulations to learn concepts ?Interactive simulation depth improves understanding before drafting. | Strong?Public simulations hub includes hundreds of IB learning simulations. | ×No?No built-in simulation library for IB concept learning. | ~Partial?Interactive learning resources exist, but a simulations count is not clearly public. |
Available for free ?Free learning content removes friction for everyday revision. | Strong?Core simulation and revision resources are publicly accessible. | ×No?Study support is chat-based, not free textbook content delivery. | ×No?Trial access exists, but full textbook access is subscription-led. |
| Oral practice | |||
Practice and get feedback ?Oral practice should include structured scoring feedback. | Strong?Built-in oral practice returns feedback after each attempt. | ~Partial?Can simulate an oral, but the student must set up the IB format in the prompt. | ×No?Not publicly positioned around oral/IO practice loops. |
Affordable oral practice ?Predictable oral-practice costs matter when students rehearse frequently. | Strong?Oral practice is included in plan limits, not charged per attempt. | ×No?Oral practice is possible, but no ready-made IB oral setup is included. | ×No?No oral practice feature is advertised. |
| Questionbank | |||
Practice IB questions ?Question practice is valuable when linked to criterion-aware feedback. | ×No?No first-party questionbank is publicly offered by Marksy. | ×No?No official IB questionbank library bundled by default. | Strong?Publicly advertises a 10,000+ question bank and auto-corrected assignments. |
| Teacher features | |||
Grade assessments in large batches ?Batch grading throughput matters for teacher workloads. | Strong?Bulk grading supports up to 15 submissions at once. | ×No?Public product is not a batch grading pipeline. | ~Partial?Assignments are managed through a school or class account. |
Export grading results in bulk ?Exportable outputs simplify moderation and record-keeping. | Strong?Feedback outputs can be reused and shared for iteration. | ×No?No structured bulk export of grading results by default. | ~Partial?Teachers can manage classroom assignments and progress data. |
Try Marksy
Marksy is made for checking several IB drafts and is rated strong for grading value, compared with no for ChatGPT and no for Kognity. Current public prices: Marksy — $0 entry with 5 full gradings/month, then paid student plans from $14.99/month. ChatGPT — Free tier is available, with paid plans publicly listed around Plus ($20/month) and Pro ($200/month). Kognity — No fixed self-serve public sticker price; schools are usually quoted custom annual contracts. Marksy leads 14 rows against ChatGPT, especially IB oriented and Specific tips, and 15 rows against Kognity, especially IA / EE / TOK grading support and Marks by criterion.
Yes. Marksy accepts full coursework submissions for supported assignments and returns a predicted mark, comments, highlights, and a list of fixes.
Marksy checks whether the file and grading result can be read. If a check fails, it can retry safely instead of showing a broken report.
Yes. The highest plan can grade up to 15 files in one batch and export the results.
Current monthly grading limits are 5 on Free, 50 on Student, and 200 on Student Plus. Oral practice and AI checks have their own monthly limits.
Marksy uses account-scoped access controls and user data-management paths. From a product-fit perspective, this page's matrix also shows ChatGPT vs Kognity at 7-6, while Marksy still leads as the practical grading-first alternative.