All orals

English A Literature IO Simulation

Full Individual Oral simulation with timed speaking, examiner-style follow-up questions, transcript feedback, and criterion-based marks.

Sign in to startPreview the practice page

How the English A Literature IO oral works

This practice page gives criterion-by-criterion feedback and a mark for your rehearsal. A strong oral does not simply compare two extracts: it builds a sustained argument about one global issue through precise moments in both extracts and their wider works.

Your prepared oral should use the first 10 minutes to introduce a focused global issue, move between the two literary extracts and their works, and show how each writer constructs meaning. The final follow-up questions test whether that understanding is flexible rather than memorized.

Useful evidence includes well-chosen references, insightful analysis of choices, balanced structure, and clear academic expression. Anchor each claim to text, authorial method, and global-issue relevance.

Assessment criteria

Marksy marks your oral against the IB assessment criteria below and gives a mark for each.

Criterion A: Knowledge, understanding and interpretation

10 marks

Whether the practice response maintains a clear direction and answers the task it has chosen to address.

What helps
Open with a focused direction, develop relevant ideas, and answer follow-up questions directly before extending them.
Watch for
A generic speech, extended background, or prepared material that does not answer the current question.

Criterion B: Analysis and evaluation

10 marks

Whether claims are supported by precise material and followed by meaningful explanation.

What helps
Refer to a specific moment or feature, explain why it matters, and consider another reading when that adds value.
Watch for
Listing features, retelling content, or leaving the listener to infer how an example supports the claim.

Criterion C: Focus and organization

10 marks

Whether a listener can follow the sequence and understand how the major ideas connect.

What helps
Use a balanced through-line, purposeful transitions, and an ending that resolves the direction announced at the start.
Watch for
Overdeveloping one point, switching topics without a link, or ending before the main idea has been resolved.

Criterion D: Language

10 marks

Whether pace, phrasing, vocabulary, and responsiveness make the intended meaning easy to follow.

What helps
Use controlled phrasing, respond naturally, and repair a misunderstanding without abandoning the idea.
Watch for
Over-rehearsed blocks that break under questions, rushed delivery, or expression that repeatedly obscures the point.

Getting more out of each rehearsal

  1. 1

    Define the global issue in a sentence narrow enough to control for ten minutes.

  2. 2

    Select extract evidence that lets you discuss authorial choices, not only theme.

  3. 3

    Map each wider-work reference to the same global-issue argument.

  4. 4

    Rehearse transitions so the comparison sounds intentional rather than alternating summaries.

  5. 5

    Practise follow-up answers that explain choices, implications, and alternative readings.

Before the real oral

  • Both extracts and both wider works receive meaningful attention.
  • Every major point names an authorial choice and explains its effect.
  • The global issue remains visible from introduction to conclusion.
  • References are precise enough that a listener can follow the textual evidence.
  • Follow-up answers extend the argument instead of repeating the prepared oral.

Questions people ask