Question 1
Paper 2Hard10 marksIn a laboratory, a laser illuminates both slits of a double-slit plate at normal incidence. The separation of adjacent bright fringes is measured on a screen parallel to the plate. A reference laser has wavelength With the original plate and a screen distance of the measured fringe separation is
Show that the slit separation of the original plate is approximately
The screen is moved to a distance of with the original plate and reference laser unchanged. Determine the fringe separation.
A replacement plate is used with the reference laser and the screen at The measured fringe separation is Determine the slit separation of the replacement plate.
The replacement plate is used with an unknown laser wavelength. The screen is at and the fringe separation is Determine the wavelength of this laser.
In a further run, an unknown laser gives a fringe separation of with the screen at but the identity of the slit plate used was not recorded. A technician claims that the laser wavelength is the same as that of the reference laser. Determine whether this claim is justified, supporting your answer quantitatively.