What is Marksy?
Marksy grades IA, EE, TOK, and other IB drafts. It also offers oral practice, source checking, online textbooks, and simulations.
Source freshness: dated public claims, last updated .
Do you want to know wether Marksy or Kognity is best for IB? This page provides a through comparison of both tools.
Last updated:
Marksy grades IA, EE, TOK, and other IB drafts. It also offers oral practice, source checking, online textbooks, and simulations.
Kognity provides digital IB textbooks, classroom assignments, and progress data for schools, teachers, and students.
| Feature | ||
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
IB oriented ?IB-specific tools need less setup than a blank chat box. | Strong?Made specifically for grading and improving IB work. | Strong?Explicit IB DP product positioning and collaboration claims. |
Affordable ?Shows what users actually pay, including per-review and billed-total caveats. | Strong?$0 entry with 5 full gradings/month, then paid student plans from $14.99/month. | ×No?No fixed self-serve public sticker price; schools are usually quoted custom annual contracts. |
Has free tier ?Students can start immediately without procurement or upfront payment. | Strong?5 complete gradings monthly on free access. | ~Partial?Free access trial path exists, but full use is school subscription-led. |
Transparent pricing ?Lower uncertainty at evaluation time. | Strong?Public monthly pricing with free, student, and teacher tiers. | ?Unclear?Pricing is per-student per-year but final costs are quote-based. |
| Coursework grading | ||
IA / EE / TOK grading support ?Made for IAs, Extended Essays, TOK, and other IB coursework. | Strong?Grades IA, EE, and TOK drafts. | ×No?Dedicated IA, EE, and TOK grading is not advertised. |
Marks by criterion ?Criterion-by-criterion marks and feedback, not generic advice. | Strong?Shows estimated marks and feedback for each assessment criterion. | ×No?The public site does not clearly show marks by coursework section. |
AI detection ?Integrity checks are native, not a separate purchase. | Strong?20-50 paid-tier AI checks monthly. | ×No?No public AI-detection check is advertised. |
Specific tips ?A clear list shows students what to fix first. | Strong?Pairs comments with a short list of changes to make next. | ×No?No dedicated list of draft-specific fixes is advertised. |
Quick ?Fast feedback leaves time to edit and check another version. | Strong?Fast feedback leaves time to edit and check another version. | ×No?Not positioned as a quick grading-feedback product. |
Human review ?Human review can help edge cases but usually adds time and cost. | ×No?Uses AI feedback rather than a human examiner review. | ×No?Not positioned as an examiner-review marketplace. |
Good price for grading drafts ?The cost of checking several drafts matters more than one review. | Strong?Subscription pricing keeps repeated retries cheaper than per-review models. | ×No?School-led annual contracts can be heavy for individual grading-focused use. |
| Textbooks and simulations | ||
Online textbooks ?Useful for understanding a topic before working on coursework. | Strong?Includes online textbook chapters as well as draft grading. | Strong?Digital IB textbook and classroom content are core pillars. |
Hundreds of simulations to learn concepts ?Interactive simulation depth improves understanding before drafting. | Strong?Public simulations hub includes hundreds of IB learning simulations. | ~Partial?Interactive learning resources exist, but a simulations count is not clearly public. |
Available for free ?Free learning content removes friction for everyday revision. | Strong?Core simulation and revision resources are publicly accessible. | ×No?Trial access exists, but full textbook access is subscription-led. |
| Oral practice | ||
Practice and get feedback ?Oral practice should include structured scoring feedback. | Strong?Built-in oral practice returns feedback after each attempt. | ×No?Not publicly positioned around oral/IO practice loops. |
Affordable oral practice ?Predictable oral-practice costs matter when students rehearse frequently. | Strong?Oral practice is included in plan limits, not charged per attempt. | ×No?No oral practice feature is advertised. |
| Questionbank | ||
Practice IB questions ?Question practice is valuable when linked to criterion-aware feedback. | ×No?No first-party questionbank is publicly offered by Marksy. | Strong?Publicly advertises a 10,000+ question bank and auto-corrected assignments. |
| Teacher features | ||
Grade assessments in large batches ?Batch grading throughput matters for teacher workloads. | Strong?Bulk grading supports up to 15 submissions at once. | ~Partial?Assignments are managed through a school or class account. |
Export grading results in bulk ?Exportable outputs simplify moderation and record-keeping. | Strong?Feedback outputs can be reused and shared for iteration. | ~Partial?Teachers can manage classroom assignments and progress data. |
Try Marksy
It can help with some parts of grading. In this comparison, Marksy leads 15 feature rows and Kognity leads 1. Marksy's clearest strengths are IA / EE / TOK grading support, Marks by criterion, and Specific tips, so it is the better choice for checking several drafts.
Kognity is rated no for marks and comments by criterion based on its public site, while Marksy is rated strong. Choose Marksy if you want that report without writing a long prompt first.
Kognity does show strengths in Practice IB questions. For marking uploaded work and getting clear, useful feedback each time, Marksy is still the better choice in this comparison.
Kognity is rated no for structured feedback, while Marksy is rated strong. If criterion-by-criterion breakdown quality is your main requirement, Marksy is generally the better fit.
Kognity is rated no for assessment-grading price value and unclear for pricing transparency. Pricing: No fixed self-serve public sticker price; schools are usually quoted custom annual contracts. Marksy snapshot: $0 entry with 5 full gradings/month, then paid student plans from $14.99/month. Marksy is rated strong on long-run value because repeated IB draft retries do not require per-review payments.