What is Marksy?
Marksy is an IB-focused grading and feedback platform built for rubric-first draft iteration across IA, EE, TOK, oral, and past-paper practice workflows.
KognityMarksy vs Kognity
Source freshness: dated public claims, last updated .
Do you want to know wether Marksy or Kognity is best for IB? This page provides a through comparison of both tools.
TL;DR
Last updated:
- •TL;DR: Marksy is the stronger Kognity alternative when the decision is about IB grading consistency, speed, and student workflow clarity.
- •Kognity can be useful in its core niche, but Marksy is optimized to convert drafts into actionable rubric-aligned feedback faster.
- •Free plan with 5 full gradings/month, then clear paid tiers at 50/200 gradings.
- •Native IB workflow for IA/EE/TOK plus oral and past-paper practice in the same product.
- •Fast feedback loops and optional batch processing for repeat submissions.
What is Kognity?
Kognity is a school-oriented digital IB learning platform combining textbook content, classroom assignments, and progress analytics for teachers and students.
Features comparison
| Feature |  Kognity | |
|---|---|---|
Price ?Shows what users actually pay, including per-review and billed-total caveats. | Strong?$0 entry with 5 full gradings/month, then paid student plans from $14.99/month. Subscription pricing keeps repeated retries cheaper than per-review models. | ×No?No fixed self-serve public sticker price; schools are usually quoted custom per-student annual contracts. |
Price value for regular IB grading ?Lower cost per repeated grading cycle matters more than one-off pricing. | Strong?Free monthly grading entry plus clear recurring tiers is strong value for frequent IB draft loops. | ×No?School-led annual pricing can be heavier for individual students seeking frequent personal grading. |
Publicly transparent pricing ?Lower uncertainty at evaluation time. | Strong?Public monthly pricing with free, student, and teacher tiers. | ?Unclear?Pricing is per-student per-year but final costs are quote-based. |
IB rubric-first grading workflow ?Purpose-built for criterion-level grading, not generic advice. | Strong?Criterion-first scoring and rubric-oriented grading UX. | ~Partial?Assessment support exists, but grading-first workflow is not core positioning. |
IA / EE / TOK submission support ?Designed for core IB assessed writing workflows. | Strong?Built for IA, EE, TOK submission workflows. | ~Partial?Broad IB subject support with classroom workflows. |
Batch submission workflow ?Multiple drafts in one flow saves turnaround time. | Strong?Batch workflows support up to 15 submissions at once. | ~Partial?Assignment workflows exist in a school/classroom context. |
Built-in oral / IO practice ?Keeps speaking prep and grading in one stack. | Strong?5-20 paid-tier oral/IO runs monthly. | ×No?Not publicly positioned around oral/IO practice loops. |
Past-paper grading/practice mode ?Supports exam-style practice inside the same product. | Strong?100-400 paid-tier questions monthly. | ~Partial?Practice center and assessment features exist, but not pitched as IA/EE grading. |
Built-in AI-detection checks ?Integrity checks are native, not a separate purchase. | Strong?20-50 paid-tier AI checks monthly. | ×No?No public AI-detection workflow positioning. |
Export-ready feedback output ?Easy to keep records and track progression. | Strong?Feedback outputs can be reused and shared for iteration. | ~Partial?Classroom assignment and data workflows are available in-platform. |
Large questionbank / revision content ?Useful, but grading conversion usually matters more for drafts. | ~Partial?Includes past-paper practice, but not a broad standalone revision library. | Strong?Publicly advertises a 10,000+ question bank and auto-corrected assignments. |
Human review / exemplar-heavy model ?Helpful for examples, but can slow repeated draft loops. | ×No?Focuses on AI-assisted grading workflow over human examiner reviews. | ×No?Not positioned as an examiner-review marketplace. |
Teacher analytics and class-level insights ?Important for departments and school rollouts. | ~Partial?Supports workflow consistency, but not marketed as a broad textbook analytics stack. | Strong?Real-time student progress and teaching-impact analytics are core messaging. |
Free entry path ?Students can start fast without procurement delays. | Strong?5 complete gradings monthly on free access. | ~Partial?Free access trial path exists, but full use is school subscription-led. |
Low-friction self-serve onboarding ?Individuals can get value quickly without school setup. | Strong?Students can sign up directly and start without school procurement. | ×No?Typical adoption flow is school-led rather than individual self-serve. |
IB-specific positioning ?Sharper product fit typically means less prompt engineering. | Strong?Positioned as an IB-specific grading workflow product. | Strong?Explicit IB DP product positioning and collaboration claims. |
Winner pick
Why not try the winner?
More Marksy comparisons
More Kognity comparisons
Kognity alternatives
Frequently Asked Questions
Can Kognity grade IB/GCSE/A-Level responses accurately?
It can support parts of the workflow, but this matrix shows Marksy leading 12 feature rows versus 2 for Kognity. Marksy's strongest edges here are Price value for regular IB grading, Built-in oral / IO practice, and Price, which is why Marksy remains the recommended default for reliable repeat grading cycles.
Does Kognity use official markscheme logic or generic AI feedback?
Kognity is currently rated partial on rubric-first grading from public documentation, while Marksy is rated strong. If you want criterion-led scoring without heavy prompt setup, Marksy is the safer choice.
Can Kognity grade handwritten scans/PDF uploads?
Kognity does show strengths in Large questionbank / revision content and Teacher analytics and class-level insights. For marking uploaded work and getting clear, useful feedback each time, Marksy is still the better choice in this comparison.
Can Kognity give criterion-level score breakdowns (not just one score)?
Kognity is rated partial for rubric-first grading, while Marksy is rated strong. If criterion-level breakdown quality is your main requirement, Marksy is generally the better fit.
Is Kognity cheaper than Marksy for regular practice?
Kognity is rated no for regular-use price value and unclear for pricing transparency. Pricing: No fixed self-serve public sticker price; schools are usually quoted custom per-student annual contracts. Marksy snapshot: $0 entry with 5 full gradings/month, then paid student plans from $14.99/month. Subscription pricing keeps repeated retries cheaper than per-review models. Marksy is rated strong on long-run value because repeated IB draft retries do not require per-review payments.
Can Kognity handle full past-paper workflows and retries safely?
Kognity is rated partial for past-paper workflow coverage, while Marksy is rated strong. For full IB grading loops with consistent repeat use, Marksy remains the recommended option.