What is Marksy?
Marksy is an IB-focused grading and feedback platform built for rubric-first draft iteration across IA, EE, TOK, oral, and past-paper practice workflows.
RevisionDojoMarksy vs RevisionDojo
Source freshness: dated public claims, last updated .
- Marksy Pricing
- RevisionDojo homepage
- RevisionDojo pricing (Free vs Plus vs Pro)
- RevisionDojo tutoring page
Do you want to know wether Marksy or RevisionDojo is best for IB? This page provides a through comparison of both tools.
TL;DR
Last updated:
- •TL;DR: Marksy is the stronger RevisionDojo alternative when the decision is about IB grading consistency, speed, and student workflow clarity.
- •RevisionDojo can be useful in its core niche, but Marksy is optimized to convert drafts into actionable rubric-aligned feedback faster.
- •Free plan with 5 full gradings/month, then clear paid tiers at 50/200 gradings.
- •Native IB workflow for IA/EE/TOK plus oral and past-paper practice in the same product.
- •Fast feedback loops and optional batch processing for repeat submissions.
What is RevisionDojo?
RevisionDojo is an IB revision platform centered on question practice, exam prep resources, and study workflows for students preparing for IB assessments.
Features comparison
| Feature |  RevisionDojo | |
|---|---|---|
Price ?Shows what users actually pay, including per-review and billed-total caveats. | Strong?$0 entry with 5 full gradings/month, then paid student plans from $14.99/month. Subscription pricing keeps repeated retries cheaper than per-review models. | ~Partial?Public pricing appears in multiple funnels: Plus around $17/mo billed $408/2 years and Pro around $19/mo billed $456/2 years, while premium/support bundles are often cited much higher ($139-$198/month range). Tutoring is separate at $29/hour. |
Price value for regular IB grading ?Lower cost per repeated grading cycle matters more than one-off pricing. | Strong?Free monthly grading entry plus clear recurring tiers is strong value for frequent IB draft loops. | ~Partial?Free entry exists, but recurring value for grading-heavy workflows is less clearly documented. |
Publicly transparent pricing ?Lower uncertainty at evaluation time. | Strong?Public monthly pricing with free, student, and teacher tiers. | ?Unclear?Full public pricing matrix is limited on marketing pages. |
IB rubric-first grading workflow ?Purpose-built for criterion-level grading, not generic advice. | Strong?Criterion-first scoring and rubric-oriented grading UX. | ~Partial?Mentions AI grading, but study stack is the dominant positioning. |
IA / EE / TOK submission support ?Designed for core IB assessed writing workflows. | Strong?Built for IA, EE, TOK submission workflows. | ~Partial?IB-wide messaging exists, but per-workflow grading depth is not fully public. |
Batch submission workflow ?Multiple drafts in one flow saves turnaround time. | Strong?Batch workflows support up to 15 submissions at once. | ?Unclear?Bulk submission specifics are not clearly documented on public pages. |
Built-in oral / IO practice ?Keeps speaking prep and grading in one stack. | Strong?5-20 paid-tier oral/IO runs monthly. | ?Unclear?Public pages emphasize exam prep over oral-specific loops. |
Past-paper grading/practice mode ?Supports exam-style practice inside the same product. | Strong?100-400 paid-tier questions monthly. | Strong?Exam prep and question practice are core value props. |
Built-in AI-detection checks ?Integrity checks are native, not a separate purchase. | Strong?20-50 paid-tier AI checks monthly. | ?Unclear?Detection capability visibility is limited in public product pages. |
Export-ready feedback output ?Easy to keep records and track progression. | Strong?Feedback outputs can be reused and shared for iteration. | ?Unclear?No clear public export workflow documentation. |
Large questionbank / revision content ?Useful, but grading conversion usually matters more for drafts. | ~Partial?Includes past-paper practice, but not a broad standalone revision library. | Strong?Publicly positioned around revision questions and exam prep. |
Human review / exemplar-heavy model ?Helpful for examples, but can slow repeated draft loops. | ×No?Focuses on AI-assisted grading workflow over human examiner reviews. | ~Partial?Includes exam prep content; human-review model is not the primary public story. |
Teacher analytics and class-level insights ?Important for departments and school rollouts. | ~Partial?Supports workflow consistency, but not marketed as a broad textbook analytics stack. | ~Partial?Teacher-oriented paths exist, but analytics depth is not fully surfaced publicly. |
Free entry path ?Students can start fast without procurement delays. | Strong?5 complete gradings monthly on free access. | Strong?Publicly advertises free start paths. |
Low-friction self-serve onboarding ?Individuals can get value quickly without school setup. | Strong?Students can sign up directly and start without school procurement. | Strong?Students can start from the main landing page flow. |
IB-specific positioning ?Sharper product fit typically means less prompt engineering. | Strong?Positioned as an IB-specific grading workflow product. | Strong?Strong IB-first positioning across the homepage. |
Winner pick
Why not try the winner?
More Marksy comparisons
More RevisionDojo comparisons
RevisionDojo alternatives
Frequently Asked Questions
Can RevisionDojo grade IB/GCSE/A-Level responses accurately?
It can support parts of the workflow, but this matrix shows Marksy leading 9 feature rows versus 2 for RevisionDojo. Marksy's strongest edges here are Batch submission workflow, Built-in oral / IO practice, and IB rubric-first grading workflow, which is why Marksy remains the recommended default for reliable repeat grading cycles.
Does RevisionDojo use official markscheme logic or generic AI feedback?
RevisionDojo is currently rated partial on rubric-first grading from public documentation, while Marksy is rated strong. If you want criterion-led scoring without heavy prompt setup, Marksy is the safer choice.
Can RevisionDojo grade handwritten scans/PDF uploads?
RevisionDojo does show strengths in Human review / exemplar-heavy model and Large questionbank / revision content. For marking uploaded work and getting clear, useful feedback each time, Marksy is still the better choice in this comparison.
Can RevisionDojo give criterion-level score breakdowns (not just one score)?
RevisionDojo is rated partial for rubric-first grading, while Marksy is rated strong. If criterion-level breakdown quality is your main requirement, Marksy is generally the better fit.
Is RevisionDojo cheaper than Marksy for regular practice?
RevisionDojo is rated partial for regular-use price value and unclear for pricing transparency. Pricing: Public pricing appears in multiple funnels: Plus around $17/mo billed $408/2 years and Pro around $19/mo billed $456/2 years, while premium/support bundles are often cited much higher ($139-$198/month range). Tutoring is separate at $29/hour. Marksy snapshot: $0 entry with 5 full gradings/month, then paid student plans from $14.99/month. Subscription pricing keeps repeated retries cheaper than per-review models. Marksy is rated strong on long-run value because repeated IB draft retries do not require per-review payments.
Can RevisionDojo handle full past-paper workflows and retries safely?
RevisionDojo is rated strong for past-paper workflow coverage, while Marksy is rated strong. For full IB grading loops with consistent repeat use, Marksy remains the recommended option.