What is Marksy?
Marksy is an IB-focused grading and feedback platform built for rubric-first draft iteration across IA, EE, TOK, oral, and past-paper practice workflows.
RevisionDojoMarksy vs RevisionDojo
Source freshness: dated public claims, last updated .
- Marksy Pricing
- RevisionDojo homepage
- RevisionDojo pricing (Free vs Plus vs Pro)
- RevisionDojo tutoring page
Do you want to know wether Marksy or RevisionDojo is best for IB? This page provides a through comparison of both tools.
TL;DR
Last updated:
- •TL;DR: Marksy is the stronger RevisionDojo alternative when the decision is about IB grading consistency, speed, and student workflow clarity.
- •RevisionDojo can be useful in its core niche, but Marksy is optimized to convert drafts into actionable rubric-aligned feedback faster.
- •Free plan with 5 full gradings/month, then clear paid tiers at 50/200 gradings.
- •Native IB workflow for IA/EE/TOK plus oral and past-paper practice in the same product.
- •Fast feedback loops and optional batch processing for repeat submissions.
What is RevisionDojo?
RevisionDojo is an IB revision platform centered on question practice, exam prep resources, and study workflows for students preparing for IB assessments.
Features comparison
| Feature |  RevisionDojo | |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
IB oriented ?IB-first workflows reduce prompt overhead and improve rubric fit. | Strong?Positioned as an IB-specific grading workflow product. | Strong?Strong IB-first positioning across the homepage. |
Affordable ?Shows what users actually pay, including per-review and billed-total caveats. | Strong?$0 entry with 5 full gradings/month, then paid student plans from $14.99/month. | ×No?Public premium pricing is high at about $198/month for full access, so it is not affordable for most students. |
Has free tier ?Students can start immediately without procurement or upfront payment. | Strong?5 complete gradings monthly on free access. | ×No?Has free tier but very limited. |
Transparent pricing ?Lower uncertainty at evaluation time. | Strong?Public monthly pricing with free, student, and teacher tiers. | ×No?Prices fluctuate a lot, and is in constant discount despite being advertised as time limited. |
| Assessment grading | ||
IA / EE / TOK grading support ?Designed for core IB assessed writing workflows. | Strong?Built for IA, EE, TOK submission workflows. | Strong?IA/EE/TOK grading support is marketed across paid workflows. |
Criterion level feedback ?Purpose-built for criterion-level grading, not generic advice. | Strong?Criterion-first scoring and rubric-oriented grading UX. | ~Partial?Criterion-level feedback is available but limited to paid tiers. |
AI detection ?Integrity checks are native, not a separate purchase. | Strong?20-50 paid-tier AI checks monthly. | Strong?AI-detection checks are included in the paid grading stack. |
Specific tips ?Actionable next steps speed up draft improvement cycles. | Strong?Actionable criterion-level tips are paired with Marksy TODO tasks so feedback turns into trackable next steps. | ×No?No consistently structured specific-tip workflow is advertised. |
Quick ?Fast turnaround keeps revision momentum high between submissions. | Strong?Fast AI-assisted turnaround supports repeat submission loops. | Strong?Core paid flows are positioned around fast turnaround for iterative student feedback. |
Human review ?Human review can help edge cases but usually adds time and cost. | ×No?Focuses on AI-assisted grading workflow over human examiner reviews. | ×No?No core human-review grading workflow is offered. |
Good price for assessment grading ?Lower cost per repeated grading cycle matters more than one-off pricing. | Strong?Subscription pricing keeps repeated retries cheaper than per-review models. | ×No?Assessment grading pricing is expensive at premium tiers and not good value. |
| Textbooks and simulations | ||
Online textbooks ?Useful for concept refreshers before running assessment feedback loops. | Strong?Includes online textbook-style revision content alongside grading workflows. | Strong?Supports online subject notes and revision resources. |
Hundreds of simulations to learn concepts ?Interactive simulation depth improves understanding before drafting. | Strong?Public simulations hub includes hundreds of IB learning simulations. | ×No?No public simulation library positioned as a core feature. |
Available for free ?Free learning content removes friction for everyday revision. | Strong?Core simulation and revision resources are publicly accessible. | ~Partial?Free content exists, but textbook access is limited. |
| Oral practice | ||
Practice and get feedback ?Oral practice should include structured scoring feedback. | Strong?Built-in oral practice returns structured feedback per run. | Strong?Oral practice with feedback is supported in paid product workflows. |
Affordable oral practice ?Predictable oral-practice costs matter when students rehearse frequently. | Strong?Oral practice is included in plan limits, not charged per attempt. | ×No?Oral-practice pricing is not affordable given limited structured support. |
| Questionbank | ||
Practice IB questions ?Question practice is valuable when linked to criterion-aware feedback. | ~Partial?Question practice is available through past papers only; there is no dedicated standalone questionbank. | Strong?Question practice is a core value proposition. |
| Past papers | ||
Past papers available ?Past papers are a core requirement for exam-season practice. | Strong?Past-paper and exam-style practice are built into the product. | ×No?No reliable first-party past-paper library is consistently available. |
Practice past papers questions with AI ?AI-assisted past-paper feedback shortens the time between attempts. | Strong?Past-paper question feedback is AI-assisted with retry loops. | ~Partial?AI grading is mentioned, but dedicated past-paper AI workflow detail is limited. |
| Teacher features | ||
Grade assessments in large batches ?Batch grading throughput matters for teacher workloads. | Strong?Batch workflows support up to 15 submissions at once. | ?Unclear?Bulk submission specifics are not clearly documented on public pages. |
Export grading results in bulk ?Exportable outputs simplify moderation and record-keeping. | Strong?Feedback outputs can be reused and shared for iteration. | ?Unclear?No clear public bulk export workflow documentation. |
Winner pick
Why not try the winner?
More Marksy comparisons
More RevisionDojo comparisons
RevisionDojo alternatives
Frequently Asked Questions
Can RevisionDojo grade IB/GCSE/A-Level responses accurately?
It can support parts of the workflow, but this matrix shows Marksy leading 13 feature rows versus 1 for RevisionDojo. Marksy's strongest edges here are Specific tips, Good price for assessment grading, and Past papers available, which is why Marksy remains the recommended default for reliable repeat grading cycles.
Does RevisionDojo use official markscheme logic or generic AI feedback?
RevisionDojo is currently rated partial on rubric-first grading from public documentation, while Marksy is rated strong. If you want criterion-led scoring without heavy prompt setup, Marksy is the safer choice.
Can RevisionDojo grade handwritten scans/PDF uploads?
RevisionDojo does show strengths in Practice IB questions. For marking uploaded work and getting clear, useful feedback each time, Marksy is still the better choice in this comparison.
Can RevisionDojo give criterion-level score breakdowns (not just one score)?
RevisionDojo is rated partial for rubric-first grading, while Marksy is rated strong. If criterion-level breakdown quality is your main requirement, Marksy is generally the better fit.
Is RevisionDojo cheaper than Marksy for regular practice?
RevisionDojo is rated no for assessment-grading price value and no for pricing transparency. Pricing: Public premium pricing is high at about $198/month for full access, so it is not affordable for most students. Marksy snapshot: $0 entry with 5 full gradings/month, then paid student plans from $14.99/month. Marksy is rated strong on long-run value because repeated IB draft retries do not require per-review payments.
Can RevisionDojo handle full past-paper workflows and retries safely?
RevisionDojo is rated partial for past-paper workflow coverage, while Marksy is rated strong. For full IB grading loops with consistent repeat use, Marksy remains the recommended option.