What is Marksy?
Marksy is an IB-focused grading and feedback platform built for rubric-first draft iteration across IA, EE, TOK, oral, and past-paper practice workflows.
Source freshness: dated public claims, last updated .
Do you want to know wether Marksy or Save My Exams is best for IB? This page provides a through comparison of both tools.
Last updated:
Marksy is an IB-focused grading and feedback platform built for rubric-first draft iteration across IA, EE, TOK, oral, and past-paper practice workflows.
Save My Exams is a revision-content platform that provides exam notes, topic questions, and past-paper style study materials across multiple exam boards including IB.
| Feature | ||
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
IB oriented ?IB-first workflows reduce prompt overhead and improve rubric fit. | Strong?Positioned as an IB-specific grading workflow product. | ~Partial?Supports IB, but also serves multiple exam boards. |
Affordable ?Shows what users actually pay, including per-review and billed-total caveats. | Strong?$0 entry with 5 full gradings/month, then paid student plans from $14.99/month. | ~Partial?Offer-led pricing varies by region and promo with multiple monthly and annual anchors. |
Has free tier ?Students can start immediately without procurement or upfront payment. | Strong?5 complete gradings monthly on free access. | Strong?Public free-join entry path is available. |
Transparent pricing ?Lower uncertainty at evaluation time. | Strong?Public monthly pricing with free, student, and teacher tiers. | ?Unclear?Pricing clarity is inconsistent across funnels, so transparency remains unclear. |
| Assessment grading | ||
IA / EE / TOK grading support ?Designed for core IB assessed writing workflows. | Strong?Built for IA, EE, TOK submission workflows. | ×No?No dedicated IA/EE/TOK grading support workflow is provided. |
Criterion level feedback ?Purpose-built for criterion-level grading, not generic advice. | Strong?Criterion-first scoring and rubric-oriented grading UX. | ×No?Public value proposition is revision content over coursework grading. |
AI detection ?Integrity checks are native, not a separate purchase. | Strong?20-50 paid-tier AI checks monthly. | ×No?No public AI-detection product positioning. |
Specific tips ?Actionable next steps speed up draft improvement cycles. | Strong?Actionable criterion-level tips are paired with Marksy TODO tasks so feedback turns into trackable next steps. | ×No?No structured specific-tip grading workflow is offered. |
Quick ?Fast turnaround keeps revision momentum high between submissions. | Strong?Fast AI-assisted turnaround supports repeat submission loops. | ×No?Not positioned as a quick grading-feedback product. |
Human review ?Human review can help edge cases but usually adds time and cost. | ×No?Focuses on AI-assisted grading workflow over human examiner reviews. | ×No?Not a human-review submission service. |
Good price for assessment grading ?Lower cost per repeated grading cycle matters more than one-off pricing. | Strong?Subscription pricing keeps repeated retries cheaper than per-review models. | ×No?Pricing is built for revision memberships, not assessment grading workflows. |
| Textbooks and simulations | ||
Online textbooks ?Useful for concept refreshers before running assessment feedback loops. | Strong?Includes online textbook-style revision content alongside grading workflows. | Strong?Revision notes, exam questions, and topic tests are public feature pillars. |
Hundreds of simulations to learn concepts ?Interactive simulation depth improves understanding before drafting. | Strong?Public simulations hub includes hundreds of IB learning simulations. | ×No?No public simulations library positioned as a core offer. |
Available for free ?Free learning content removes friction for everyday revision. | Strong?Core simulation and revision resources are publicly accessible. | ~Partial?Free access exists, with deeper revision access behind paid plans. |
| Oral practice | ||
Practice and get feedback ?Oral practice should include structured scoring feedback. | Strong?Built-in oral practice returns structured feedback per run. | ×No?No public oral/IO feedback workflow. |
Affordable oral practice ?Predictable oral-practice costs matter when students rehearse frequently. | Strong?Oral practice is included in plan limits, not charged per attempt. | ×No?No affordable oral-practice workflow is offered due to lack of oral support. |
| Questionbank | ||
Practice IB questions ?Question practice is valuable when linked to criterion-aware feedback. | ~Partial?Question practice is available through past papers only; there is no dedicated standalone questionbank. | Strong?Publicly positioned around exam questions and topic tests. |
| Past papers | ||
Past papers available ?Past papers are a core requirement for exam-season practice. | Strong?Past-paper and exam-style practice are built into the product. | ×No?No first-party past-paper library is consistently available. |
Practice past papers questions with AI ?AI-assisted past-paper feedback shortens the time between attempts. | Strong?Past-paper question feedback is AI-assisted with retry loops. | ×No?Past-paper support is content-driven, not AI practice feedback driven. |
| Teacher features | ||
Grade assessments in large batches ?Batch grading throughput matters for teacher workloads. | Strong?Batch workflows support up to 15 submissions at once. | ×No?No public bulk grading workflow. |
Export grading results in bulk ?Exportable outputs simplify moderation and record-keeping. | Strong?Feedback outputs can be reused and shared for iteration. | ×No?Not positioned as an exportable grading feedback platform. |
Winner pick
It can support parts of the workflow, but this matrix shows Marksy leading 17 feature rows versus 1 for Save My Exams. Marksy's strongest edges here are IA / EE / TOK grading support, Criterion level feedback, and Specific tips, which is why Marksy remains the recommended default for reliable repeat grading cycles.
Save My Exams is currently rated no on rubric-first grading from public documentation, while Marksy is rated strong. If you want criterion-led scoring without heavy prompt setup, Marksy is the safer choice.
Save My Exams does show strengths in Practice IB questions. For marking uploaded work and getting clear, useful feedback each time, Marksy is still the better choice in this comparison.
Save My Exams is rated no for rubric-first grading, while Marksy is rated strong. If criterion-level breakdown quality is your main requirement, Marksy is generally the better fit.
Save My Exams is rated no for assessment-grading price value and unclear for pricing transparency. Pricing: Offer-led pricing varies by region and promo with multiple monthly and annual anchors. Marksy snapshot: $0 entry with 5 full gradings/month, then paid student plans from $14.99/month. Marksy is rated strong on long-run value because repeated IB draft retries do not require per-review payments.
Save My Exams is rated no for past-paper workflow coverage, while Marksy is rated strong. For full IB grading loops with consistent repeat use, Marksy remains the recommended option.