Marksy iconMarksySave My Exams iconSave My Exams

Marksy vs Save My Exams

Source freshness: dated public claims, last updated .

Do you want to know wether Marksy or Save My Exams is best for IB? This page provides a through comparison of both tools.

TL;DR

Last updated:

  • TL;DR: Marksy is the stronger Save My Exams alternative when the decision is about IB grading consistency, speed, and student workflow clarity.
  • Save My Exams can be useful in its core niche, but Marksy is optimized to convert drafts into actionable rubric-aligned feedback faster.
  • Free plan with 5 full gradings/month, then clear paid tiers at 50/200 gradings.
  • Native IB workflow for IA/EE/TOK plus oral and past-paper practice in the same product.
  • Fast feedback loops and optional batch processing for repeat submissions.

Marksy iconWhat is Marksy?

Marksy is an IB-focused grading and feedback platform built for rubric-first draft iteration across IA, EE, TOK, oral, and past-paper practice workflows.

Save My Exams iconWhat is Save My Exams?

Save My Exams is a revision-content platform that provides exam notes, topic questions, and past-paper style study materials across multiple exam boards including IB.

Features comparison

Feature
Marksy iconMarksy
Save My Exams iconSave My Exams

Price

?Shows what users actually pay, including per-review and billed-total caveats.
Strong?$0 entry with 5 full gradings/month, then paid student plans from $14.99/month. Subscription pricing keeps repeated retries cheaper than per-review models.
~Partial?Offer-led pricing varies by region and promo. Public pricing config includes multiple USD monthly anchors ($30/$40/$50/$60) and annual anchors ($72/$96/$120/$144).

Price value for regular IB grading

?Lower cost per repeated grading cycle matters more than one-off pricing.
Strong?Free monthly grading entry plus clear recurring tiers is strong value for frequent IB draft loops.
~Partial?Reasonable revision-membership value, but not optimized for repeated grading and feedback workflows.

Publicly transparent pricing

?Lower uncertainty at evaluation time.
Strong?Public monthly pricing with free, student, and teacher tiers.
~Partial?Membership flow is public, though full matrix detail can vary by funnel.

IB rubric-first grading workflow

?Purpose-built for criterion-level grading, not generic advice.
Strong?Criterion-first scoring and rubric-oriented grading UX.
×No?Public value proposition is revision content over coursework grading.

IA / EE / TOK submission support

?Designed for core IB assessed writing workflows.
Strong?Built for IA, EE, TOK submission workflows.
~Partial?Supports IB study prep, but not a grading-first IA/EE/TOK workflow.

Batch submission workflow

?Multiple drafts in one flow saves turnaround time.
Strong?Batch workflows support up to 15 submissions at once.
×No?No public bulk grading workflow.

Built-in oral / IO practice

?Keeps speaking prep and grading in one stack.
Strong?5-20 paid-tier oral/IO runs monthly.
×No?No public oral/IO feedback workflow.

Past-paper grading/practice mode

?Supports exam-style practice inside the same product.
Strong?100-400 paid-tier questions monthly.
Strong?Past papers and exam-style mock practice are core features.

Built-in AI-detection checks

?Integrity checks are native, not a separate purchase.
Strong?20-50 paid-tier AI checks monthly.
×No?No public AI-detection product positioning.

Export-ready feedback output

?Easy to keep records and track progression.
Strong?Feedback outputs can be reused and shared for iteration.
×No?Not positioned as an exportable grading feedback platform.

Large questionbank / revision content

?Useful, but grading conversion usually matters more for drafts.
~Partial?Includes past-paper practice, but not a broad standalone revision library.
Strong?Revision notes, exam questions, and topic tests are public feature pillars.

Human review / exemplar-heavy model

?Helpful for examples, but can slow repeated draft loops.
×No?Focuses on AI-assisted grading workflow over human examiner reviews.
~Partial?Strong revision content catalog, but not a submission review service.

Teacher analytics and class-level insights

?Important for departments and school rollouts.
~Partial?Supports workflow consistency, but not marketed as a broad textbook analytics stack.
~Partial?Teacher tools exist, but class analytics depth is secondary publicly.

Free entry path

?Students can start fast without procurement delays.
Strong?5 complete gradings monthly on free access.
Strong?Public free-join entry path is available.

Low-friction self-serve onboarding

?Individuals can get value quickly without school setup.
Strong?Students can sign up directly and start without school procurement.
Strong?Students can self-serve study access.

IB-specific positioning

?Sharper product fit typically means less prompt engineering.
Strong?Positioned as an IB-specific grading workflow product.
~Partial?Supports IB, but also serves multiple exam boards.

Winner pick

Why not try the winner?

Frequently Asked Questions

Can Save My Exams grade IB/GCSE/A-Level responses accurately?

It can support parts of the workflow, but this matrix shows Marksy leading 10 feature rows versus 2 for Save My Exams. Marksy's strongest edges here are IB rubric-first grading workflow, Batch submission workflow, and Built-in oral / IO practice, which is why Marksy remains the recommended default for reliable repeat grading cycles.

Does Save My Exams use official markscheme logic or generic AI feedback?

Save My Exams is currently rated no on rubric-first grading from public documentation, while Marksy is rated strong. If you want criterion-led scoring without heavy prompt setup, Marksy is the safer choice.

Can Save My Exams grade handwritten scans/PDF uploads?

Save My Exams does show strengths in Human review / exemplar-heavy model and Large questionbank / revision content. For marking uploaded work and getting clear, useful feedback each time, Marksy is still the better choice in this comparison.

Can Save My Exams give criterion-level score breakdowns (not just one score)?

Save My Exams is rated no for rubric-first grading, while Marksy is rated strong. If criterion-level breakdown quality is your main requirement, Marksy is generally the better fit.

Is Save My Exams cheaper than Marksy for regular practice?

Save My Exams is rated partial for regular-use price value and partial for pricing transparency. Pricing: Offer-led pricing varies by region and promo. Public pricing config includes multiple USD monthly anchors ($30/$40/$50/$60) and annual anchors ($72/$96/$120/$144). Marksy snapshot: $0 entry with 5 full gradings/month, then paid student plans from $14.99/month. Subscription pricing keeps repeated retries cheaper than per-review models. Marksy is rated strong on long-run value because repeated IB draft retries do not require per-review payments.

Can Save My Exams handle full past-paper workflows and retries safely?

Save My Exams is rated strong for past-paper workflow coverage, while Marksy is rated strong. For full IB grading loops with consistent repeat use, Marksy remains the recommended option.