What is Marksy?
Marksy is an IB-focused grading and feedback platform built for rubric-first draft iteration across IA, EE, TOK, oral, and past-paper practice workflows.
Source freshness: dated public claims, last updated .
Do you want to know wether Marksy or Save My Exams is best for IB? This page provides a through comparison of both tools.
Last updated:
Marksy is an IB-focused grading and feedback platform built for rubric-first draft iteration across IA, EE, TOK, oral, and past-paper practice workflows.
Save My Exams is a revision-content platform that provides exam notes, topic questions, and past-paper style study materials across multiple exam boards including IB.
| Feature | ||
|---|---|---|
Price ?Shows what users actually pay, including per-review and billed-total caveats. | Strong?$0 entry with 5 full gradings/month, then paid student plans from $14.99/month. Subscription pricing keeps repeated retries cheaper than per-review models. | ~Partial?Offer-led pricing varies by region and promo. Public pricing config includes multiple USD monthly anchors ($30/$40/$50/$60) and annual anchors ($72/$96/$120/$144). |
Price value for regular IB grading ?Lower cost per repeated grading cycle matters more than one-off pricing. | Strong?Free monthly grading entry plus clear recurring tiers is strong value for frequent IB draft loops. | ~Partial?Reasonable revision-membership value, but not optimized for repeated grading and feedback workflows. |
Publicly transparent pricing ?Lower uncertainty at evaluation time. | Strong?Public monthly pricing with free, student, and teacher tiers. | ~Partial?Membership flow is public, though full matrix detail can vary by funnel. |
IB rubric-first grading workflow ?Purpose-built for criterion-level grading, not generic advice. | Strong?Criterion-first scoring and rubric-oriented grading UX. | ×No?Public value proposition is revision content over coursework grading. |
IA / EE / TOK submission support ?Designed for core IB assessed writing workflows. | Strong?Built for IA, EE, TOK submission workflows. | ~Partial?Supports IB study prep, but not a grading-first IA/EE/TOK workflow. |
Batch submission workflow ?Multiple drafts in one flow saves turnaround time. | Strong?Batch workflows support up to 15 submissions at once. | ×No?No public bulk grading workflow. |
Built-in oral / IO practice ?Keeps speaking prep and grading in one stack. | Strong?5-20 paid-tier oral/IO runs monthly. | ×No?No public oral/IO feedback workflow. |
Past-paper grading/practice mode ?Supports exam-style practice inside the same product. | Strong?100-400 paid-tier questions monthly. | Strong?Past papers and exam-style mock practice are core features. |
Built-in AI-detection checks ?Integrity checks are native, not a separate purchase. | Strong?20-50 paid-tier AI checks monthly. | ×No?No public AI-detection product positioning. |
Export-ready feedback output ?Easy to keep records and track progression. | Strong?Feedback outputs can be reused and shared for iteration. | ×No?Not positioned as an exportable grading feedback platform. |
Large questionbank / revision content ?Useful, but grading conversion usually matters more for drafts. | ~Partial?Includes past-paper practice, but not a broad standalone revision library. | Strong?Revision notes, exam questions, and topic tests are public feature pillars. |
Human review / exemplar-heavy model ?Helpful for examples, but can slow repeated draft loops. | ×No?Focuses on AI-assisted grading workflow over human examiner reviews. | ~Partial?Strong revision content catalog, but not a submission review service. |
Teacher analytics and class-level insights ?Important for departments and school rollouts. | ~Partial?Supports workflow consistency, but not marketed as a broad textbook analytics stack. | ~Partial?Teacher tools exist, but class analytics depth is secondary publicly. |
Free entry path ?Students can start fast without procurement delays. | Strong?5 complete gradings monthly on free access. | Strong?Public free-join entry path is available. |
Low-friction self-serve onboarding ?Individuals can get value quickly without school setup. | Strong?Students can sign up directly and start without school procurement. | Strong?Students can self-serve study access. |
IB-specific positioning ?Sharper product fit typically means less prompt engineering. | Strong?Positioned as an IB-specific grading workflow product. | ~Partial?Supports IB, but also serves multiple exam boards. |
Winner pick
It can support parts of the workflow, but this matrix shows Marksy leading 10 feature rows versus 2 for Save My Exams. Marksy's strongest edges here are IB rubric-first grading workflow, Batch submission workflow, and Built-in oral / IO practice, which is why Marksy remains the recommended default for reliable repeat grading cycles.
Save My Exams is currently rated no on rubric-first grading from public documentation, while Marksy is rated strong. If you want criterion-led scoring without heavy prompt setup, Marksy is the safer choice.
Save My Exams does show strengths in Human review / exemplar-heavy model and Large questionbank / revision content. For marking uploaded work and getting clear, useful feedback each time, Marksy is still the better choice in this comparison.
Save My Exams is rated no for rubric-first grading, while Marksy is rated strong. If criterion-level breakdown quality is your main requirement, Marksy is generally the better fit.
Save My Exams is rated partial for regular-use price value and partial for pricing transparency. Pricing: Offer-led pricing varies by region and promo. Public pricing config includes multiple USD monthly anchors ($30/$40/$50/$60) and annual anchors ($72/$96/$120/$144). Marksy snapshot: $0 entry with 5 full gradings/month, then paid student plans from $14.99/month. Subscription pricing keeps repeated retries cheaper than per-review models. Marksy is rated strong on long-run value because repeated IB draft retries do not require per-review payments.
Save My Exams is rated strong for past-paper workflow coverage, while Marksy is rated strong. For full IB grading loops with consistent repeat use, Marksy remains the recommended option.