IB Physics HL D.2 Electric and magnetic fields questions

Exam-style multiple choice and written questions with full markschemes. Check multiple choice answers straight away, or type, photograph or draw a written answer and get it marked.

Question 1

Paper 2Hard10 marks

In a simplified Millikan oil-drop experiment, negatively charged drops are held stationary between parallel plates. The polarity is chosen so that the electric force on a drop is upward. Assume buoyancy and other forces are negligible. The potential difference between the plates is 400 V400\ \mathrm{V} and their separation is 4.00 mm4.00\ \mathrm{mm}

Drop A has mass 4.90×10−15 kg4.90\times10^{-15}\ \mathrm{kg} Further drops are measured using the same method. The uncertainty in each charge estimate, including that for drop A, is ±0.08×10−19 C\pm0.08\times10^{-19}\ \mathrm{C} An independently calibrated candidate value is e0=1.60×10−19 Ce_0=1.60\times10^{-19}\ \mathrm{C} treat its uncertainty as negligible.

DropMeasured charge magnitude / 10−19 C10^{-19}\ \mathrm{C}
B3.18
C4.79
D6.39
E8.01
F5.55
(a)

Show that the magnitude qq of the charge on a stationary drop is given by

q=mgdV,q=\frac{mgd}{V},

where mm is the drop mass, gg is gravitational field strength, dd is the plate separation and VV is the potential difference.

[2]
(b)

Calculate the magnitude of the charge on drop A. Give your answer in coulombs.

[2]
(c)

Using e0e_0 and your answer to (b), determine the nearest integer nn for each of drops A–E, where q≈ne0q\approx ne_0

[2]
(d)

A student claims that the results for drops A–E establish that e0e_0 is the smallest possible charge, while drop F disproves charge quantization. Evaluate this claim using the measurements and their uncertainties.

[4]

The best questions are still waiting

Unlock every question in this topic, then type, photograph or draw your answer and have it marked against the markscheme. Find out where you are dropping marks.