What is Revision Village?
Revision Village is an IB exam-prep platform focused on questionbanks, worked solutions, and past-paper style practice content for core IB subjects.
Revision Village
KognityRevision Village vs Kognity
Source freshness: dated public claims, last updated .
Do you want to know wether Revision Village or Kognity is best for IB? This page provides a through comparison of both tools.
TL;DR
Last updated:
- •TL;DR: In Revision Village vs Kognity, Marksy is included as a third benchmark and usually wins on grading workflow depth and repeatability.
- •Revision Village and Kognity each have strengths, but Marksy is generally the best alternative if your priority is getting IB-ready grading output fast.
- •Free plan with 5 full gradings/month, then clear paid tiers at 50/200 gradings.
- •Native IB workflow for IA/EE/TOK plus oral and past-paper practice in the same product.
- •Fast feedback loops and optional batch processing for repeat submissions.
What is Kognity?
Kognity is a school-oriented digital IB learning platform combining textbook content, classroom assignments, and progress analytics for teachers and students.
Features comparison
| Feature |  Revision Village |  Kognity | |
|---|---|---|---|
Price ?Shows what users actually pay, including per-review and billed-total caveats. | Strong?$0 entry with 5 full gradings/month, then paid student plans from $14.99/month. Subscription pricing keeps repeated retries cheaper than per-review models. | ×No?Public Gold snapshots include subject plans at $70 monthly, $150/3 months, $210/6 months, and $249 full-course, with higher complete-suite plans (for example $140 monthly). | ×No?No fixed self-serve public sticker price; schools are usually quoted custom per-student annual contracts. |
Price value for regular IB grading ?Lower cost per repeated grading cycle matters more than one-off pricing. | Strong?Free monthly grading entry plus clear recurring tiers is strong value for frequent IB draft loops. | ~Partial?Can be good value for exam-prep libraries, but less pricing-fit for grading-first submission loops. | ×No?School-led annual pricing can be heavier for individual students seeking frequent personal grading. |
Publicly transparent pricing ?Lower uncertainty at evaluation time. | Strong?Public monthly pricing with free, student, and teacher tiers. | Strong?Membership and plan framing is publicly visible. | ?Unclear?Pricing is per-student per-year but final costs are quote-based. |
IB rubric-first grading workflow ?Purpose-built for criterion-level grading, not generic advice. | Strong?Criterion-first scoring and rubric-oriented grading UX. | ×No?Positioned around practice content, not draft grading workflows. | ~Partial?Assessment support exists, but grading-first workflow is not core positioning. |
IA / EE / TOK submission support ?Designed for core IB assessed writing workflows. | Strong?Built for IA, EE, TOK submission workflows. | ~Partial?Expanding resources exist, but primary product is exam prep content. | ~Partial?Broad IB subject support with classroom workflows. |
Batch submission workflow ?Multiple drafts in one flow saves turnaround time. | Strong?Batch workflows support up to 15 submissions at once. | ×No?No public bulk submission grading workflow. | ~Partial?Assignment workflows exist in a school/classroom context. |
Built-in oral / IO practice ?Keeps speaking prep and grading in one stack. | Strong?5-20 paid-tier oral/IO runs monthly. | ×No?Not publicly positioned as oral/IO practice software. | ×No?Not publicly positioned around oral/IO practice loops. |
Past-paper grading/practice mode ?Supports exam-style practice inside the same product. | Strong?100-400 paid-tier questions monthly. | Strong?Past-paper and mock-exam practice are core parts of the product. | ~Partial?Practice center and assessment features exist, but not pitched as IA/EE grading. |
Built-in AI-detection checks ?Integrity checks are native, not a separate purchase. | Strong?20-50 paid-tier AI checks monthly. | ×No?No public built-in AI-detection feature positioning. | ×No?No public AI-detection workflow positioning. |
Export-ready feedback output ?Easy to keep records and track progression. | Strong?Feedback outputs can be reused and shared for iteration. | ×No?No public workflow centered on exportable coursework feedback. | ~Partial?Classroom assignment and data workflows are available in-platform. |
Large questionbank / revision content ?Useful, but grading conversion usually matters more for drafts. | ~Partial?Includes past-paper practice, but not a broad standalone revision library. | Strong?Strong questionbank and markscheme/video-solution coverage. | Strong?Publicly advertises a 10,000+ question bank and auto-corrected assignments. |
Human review / exemplar-heavy model ?Helpful for examples, but can slow repeated draft loops. | ×No?Focuses on AI-assisted grading workflow over human examiner reviews. | ~Partial?Resource-led support rather than ongoing review workflow. | ×No?Not positioned as an examiner-review marketplace. |
Teacher analytics and class-level insights ?Important for departments and school rollouts. | ~Partial?Supports workflow consistency, but not marketed as a broad textbook analytics stack. | ×No?Not positioned as analytics software for class-level interventions. | Strong?Real-time student progress and teaching-impact analytics are core messaging. |
Free entry path ?Students can start fast without procurement delays. | Strong?5 complete gradings monthly on free access. | ~Partial?Open-study access exists with premium membership upsell. | ~Partial?Free access trial path exists, but full use is school subscription-led. |
Low-friction self-serve onboarding ?Individuals can get value quickly without school setup. | Strong?Students can sign up directly and start without school procurement. | Strong?Student self-serve membership flow is public. | ×No?Typical adoption flow is school-led rather than individual self-serve. |
IB-specific positioning ?Sharper product fit typically means less prompt engineering. | Strong?Positioned as an IB-specific grading workflow product. | Strong?IB exam prep is the core market positioning. | Strong?Explicit IB DP product positioning and collaboration claims. |
Winner pick
Why not try the winner?
More Revision Village comparisons
More Kognity comparisons
Find the best alternatives to Revision Village and Kognity
Frequently Asked Questions
What makes Marksy different from Revision Village or Kognity?
Marksy stays purpose-built for repeatable grading workflows and is rated strong on regular-use price value (vs partial for Revision Village and no for Kognity). Pricing: Marksy -> $0 entry with 5 full gradings/month, then paid student plans from $14.99/month. Subscription pricing keeps repeated retries cheaper than per-review models. Revision Village -> Public Gold snapshots include subject plans at $70 monthly, $150/3 months, $210/6 months, and $249 full-course, with higher complete-suite plans (for example $140 monthly). Kognity -> No fixed self-serve public sticker price; schools are usually quoted custom per-student annual contracts. Against Revision Village, Marksy leads 10 rows with key edges in IB rubric-first grading workflow and Batch submission workflow. Against Kognity, Marksy leads 12 rows with key edges in Price value for regular IB grading and Built-in oral / IO practice.
Can Marksy grade full papers and per-question attempts?
Yes. Marksy supports both full-paper and per-question grading flows. This is one reason it continues to score as the best overall alternative while competitors split strengths.
How does Marksy handle OCR/parsing failures or invalid outputs?
Marksy is designed for production grading loops with parsing validation and retry-safe behavior. That workflow reliability is a key reason Marksy remains the preferred choice over generic or content-only stacks.
Does Marksy support teacher workflows (bulk grading/class use)?
Yes. Marksy is optimized for repeat teacher and class workflows, including bulk-oriented grading paths. Even if this head-to-head has close spots, Marksy remains the stronger alternative for operational grading throughput.
What are Marksy usage limits for Free/Student/Teacher tiers?
Current monthly grading limits are 5 (Free), 50 (Student), and 200 (Teacher), with additional tiered limits for oral, past-paper, and AI-check workflows.
Is student data private and can users delete data?
Marksy uses account-scoped access controls and user data-management paths. From a product-fit perspective, this page's matrix also shows Revision Village vs Kognity at 5-4, while Marksy still leads as the practical grading-first alternative.