What is Revision Village?
Revision Village focuses on IB question banks, worked solutions, and past-paper-style practice for core subjects.
Source freshness: dated public claims, last updated .
Do you want to know wether Revision Village or RevisionDojo is best for IB? This page provides a through comparison of both tools.
Last updated:
Revision Village focuses on IB question banks, worked solutions, and past-paper-style practice for core subjects.
RevisionDojo offers IB question practice, exam preparation, study resources, and coursework tools.
| Feature | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| General | |||
IB oriented ?IB-specific tools need less setup than a blank chat box. | Strong?Made specifically for grading and improving IB work. | Strong?IB exam prep is the core market positioning. | Strong?Strong IB-first positioning across the homepage. |
Affordable ?Shows what users actually pay, including per-review and billed-total caveats. | Strong?$0 entry with 5 full gradings/month, then paid student plans from $14.99/month. | ×No?Public Gold snapshots include subject plans at $70 monthly and higher full-suite plans. | ×No?Public premium pricing is high at about $198/month for full access, so it is not affordable for most students. |
Has free tier ?Students can start immediately without procurement or upfront payment. | Strong?5 complete gradings monthly on free access. | ~Partial?Open-study access exists with premium membership upsell. | ×No?Has free tier but very limited. |
Transparent pricing ?Lower uncertainty at evaluation time. | Strong?Public monthly pricing with free, student, and teacher tiers. | Strong?Membership and plan framing is publicly visible. | ×No?Prices fluctuate a lot, and is in constant discount despite being advertised as time limited. |
| Coursework grading | |||
IA / EE / TOK grading support ?Made for IAs, Extended Essays, TOK, and other IB coursework. | Strong?Grades IA, EE, and TOK drafts. | ×No?Dedicated IA, EE, and TOK grading is not advertised. | Strong?Paid plans advertise IA, EE, and TOK grading. |
Marks by criterion ?Criterion-by-criterion marks and feedback, not generic advice. | Strong?Shows estimated marks and feedback for each assessment criterion. | ×No?Focused on practice content rather than grading student drafts. | ~Partial?Structured feedback is available but limited to paid tiers. |
AI detection ?Integrity checks are native, not a separate purchase. | Strong?20-50 paid-tier AI checks monthly. | ×No?No public built-in AI-detection feature positioning. | Strong?Paid grading plans include AI-detection checks. |
Specific tips ?A clear list shows students what to fix first. | Strong?Pairs comments with a short list of changes to make next. | ×No?No dedicated list of draft-specific fixes is advertised. | ×No?The public site does not clearly show a consistent list of specific fixes. |
Quick ?Fast feedback leaves time to edit and check another version. | Strong?Fast feedback leaves time to edit and check another version. | ×No?Speed claims focus on exam practice rather than grading IA, EE, or TOK drafts. | Strong?Core paid flows are positioned around fast turnaround for iterative student feedback. |
Human review ?Human review can help edge cases but usually adds time and cost. | ×No?Uses AI feedback rather than a human examiner review. | ×No?Not positioned as a human examiner review service. | ×No?A human grading review is not a main advertised feature. |
Good price for grading drafts ?The cost of checking several drafts matters more than one review. | Strong?Subscription pricing keeps repeated retries cheaper than per-review models. | ×No?Pricing is built around revision content rather than grading drafts. | ×No?Premium plans are expensive if you mainly want to grade drafts. |
| Textbooks and simulations | |||
Online textbooks ?Useful for understanding a topic before working on coursework. | Strong?Includes online textbook chapters as well as draft grading. | ×No?No online textbook product is offered. | Strong?Supports online subject notes and revision resources. |
Hundreds of simulations to learn concepts ?Interactive simulation depth improves understanding before drafting. | Strong?Public simulations hub includes hundreds of IB learning simulations. | ×No?No public simulation library is a core product pillar. | ×No?No public simulation library positioned as a core feature. |
Available for free ?Free learning content removes friction for everyday revision. | Strong?Core simulation and revision resources are publicly accessible. | ~Partial?Some open-study access exists before premium membership upgrades. | ~Partial?Free content exists, but textbook access is limited. |
| Oral practice | |||
Practice and get feedback ?Oral practice should include structured scoring feedback. | Strong?Built-in oral practice returns feedback after each attempt. | ×No?Not publicly positioned as an oral-practice feedback product. | Strong?Paid plans include oral practice with feedback. |
Affordable oral practice ?Predictable oral-practice costs matter when students rehearse frequently. | Strong?Oral practice is included in plan limits, not charged per attempt. | ×No?No oral practice feature is advertised. | ×No?Oral-practice pricing is not affordable given limited structured support. |
| Questionbank | |||
Practice IB questions ?Question practice is valuable when linked to criterion-aware feedback. | ×No?No first-party questionbank is publicly offered by Marksy. | Strong?Strong IB questionbank and markscheme/video-solution coverage. | Strong?Question practice is a core value proposition. |
| Teacher features | |||
Grade assessments in large batches ?Batch grading throughput matters for teacher workloads. | Strong?Bulk grading supports up to 15 submissions at once. | ×No?No public bulk submission grading feature is advertised. | ?Unclear?Bulk submission specifics are not clearly documented on public pages. |
Export grading results in bulk ?Exportable outputs simplify moderation and record-keeping. | Strong?Feedback outputs can be reused and shared for iteration. | ×No?No public grading-result export feature is advertised. | ?Unclear?The public site does not clearly explain bulk result exports. |
Try Marksy
Marksy is made for checking several IB drafts and is rated strong for grading value, compared with no for Revision Village and no for RevisionDojo. Current public prices: Marksy — $0 entry with 5 full gradings/month, then paid student plans from $14.99/month. Revision Village — Public Gold snapshots include subject plans at $70 monthly and higher full-suite plans. RevisionDojo — Public premium pricing is high at about $198/month for full access, so it is not affordable for most students. Marksy leads 15 rows against Revision Village, especially IA / EE / TOK grading support and Marks by criterion, and 11 rows against RevisionDojo, especially Specific tips and Good price for grading drafts.
Yes. Marksy accepts full coursework submissions for supported assignments and returns a predicted mark, comments, highlights, and a list of fixes.
Marksy checks whether the file and grading result can be read. If a check fails, it can retry safely instead of showing a broken report.
Yes. The highest plan can grade up to 15 files in one batch and export the results.
Current monthly grading limits are 5 on Free, 50 on Student, and 200 on Student Plus. Oral practice and AI checks have their own monthly limits.
Marksy uses account-scoped access controls and user data-management paths. From a product-fit perspective, this page's matrix also shows Revision Village vs RevisionDojo at 2-6, while Marksy still leads as the practical grading-first alternative.