What is RevisionDojo?
RevisionDojo offers IB question practice, exam preparation, study resources, and coursework tools.
Source freshness: dated public claims, last updated .
Do you want to know wether RevisionDojo or Save My Exams is best for IB? This page provides a through comparison of both tools.
Last updated:
RevisionDojo offers IB question practice, exam preparation, study resources, and coursework tools.
Save My Exams provides revision notes, topic questions, and past-paper-style study materials for IB and other exam boards.
| Feature | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| General | |||
IB oriented ?IB-specific tools need less setup than a blank chat box. | Strong?Made specifically for grading and improving IB work. | Strong?Strong IB-first positioning across the homepage. | ~Partial?Supports IB, but also serves multiple exam boards. |
Affordable ?Shows what users actually pay, including per-review and billed-total caveats. | Strong?$0 entry with 5 full gradings/month, then paid student plans from $14.99/month. | ×No?Public premium pricing is high at about $198/month for full access, so it is not affordable for most students. | ~Partial?Offer-led pricing varies by region and promo with multiple monthly and annual anchors. |
Has free tier ?Students can start immediately without procurement or upfront payment. | Strong?5 complete gradings monthly on free access. | ×No?Has free tier but very limited. | Strong?Public free-join entry path is available. |
Transparent pricing ?Lower uncertainty at evaluation time. | Strong?Public monthly pricing with free, student, and teacher tiers. | ×No?Prices fluctuate a lot, and is in constant discount despite being advertised as time limited. | ?Unclear?Pricing clarity is inconsistent across funnels, so transparency remains unclear. |
| Coursework grading | |||
IA / EE / TOK grading support ?Made for IAs, Extended Essays, TOK, and other IB coursework. | Strong?Grades IA, EE, and TOK drafts. | Strong?Paid plans advertise IA, EE, and TOK grading. | ×No?Dedicated IA, EE, and TOK grading is not advertised. |
Marks by criterion ?Criterion-by-criterion marks and feedback, not generic advice. | Strong?Shows estimated marks and feedback for each assessment criterion. | ~Partial?Structured feedback is available but limited to paid tiers. | ×No?Public value proposition is revision content over coursework grading. |
AI detection ?Integrity checks are native, not a separate purchase. | Strong?20-50 paid-tier AI checks monthly. | Strong?Paid grading plans include AI-detection checks. | ×No?No public AI-detection product positioning. |
Specific tips ?A clear list shows students what to fix first. | Strong?Pairs comments with a short list of changes to make next. | ×No?The public site does not clearly show a consistent list of specific fixes. | ×No?No dedicated list of draft-specific fixes is advertised. |
Quick ?Fast feedback leaves time to edit and check another version. | Strong?Fast feedback leaves time to edit and check another version. | Strong?Core paid flows are positioned around fast turnaround for iterative student feedback. | ×No?Not positioned as a quick grading-feedback product. |
Human review ?Human review can help edge cases but usually adds time and cost. | ×No?Uses AI feedback rather than a human examiner review. | ×No?A human grading review is not a main advertised feature. | ×No?Not a human-review submission service. |
Good price for grading drafts ?The cost of checking several drafts matters more than one review. | Strong?Subscription pricing keeps repeated retries cheaper than per-review models. | ×No?Premium plans are expensive if you mainly want to grade drafts. | ×No?Pricing is for revision content rather than grading coursework drafts. |
| Textbooks and simulations | |||
Online textbooks ?Useful for understanding a topic before working on coursework. | Strong?Includes online textbook chapters as well as draft grading. | Strong?Supports online subject notes and revision resources. | Strong?Revision notes, exam questions, and topic tests are public feature pillars. |
Hundreds of simulations to learn concepts ?Interactive simulation depth improves understanding before drafting. | Strong?Public simulations hub includes hundreds of IB learning simulations. | ×No?No public simulation library positioned as a core feature. | ×No?No public simulations library positioned as a core offer. |
Available for free ?Free learning content removes friction for everyday revision. | Strong?Core simulation and revision resources are publicly accessible. | ~Partial?Free content exists, but textbook access is limited. | ~Partial?Free access exists, with deeper revision access behind paid plans. |
| Oral practice | |||
Practice and get feedback ?Oral practice should include structured scoring feedback. | Strong?Built-in oral practice returns feedback after each attempt. | Strong?Paid plans include oral practice with feedback. | ×No?No public oral or IO feedback feature is advertised. |
Affordable oral practice ?Predictable oral-practice costs matter when students rehearse frequently. | Strong?Oral practice is included in plan limits, not charged per attempt. | ×No?Oral-practice pricing is not affordable given limited structured support. | ×No?No oral practice feature is advertised. |
| Questionbank | |||
Practice IB questions ?Question practice is valuable when linked to criterion-aware feedback. | ×No?No first-party questionbank is publicly offered by Marksy. | Strong?Question practice is a core value proposition. | Strong?Publicly positioned around exam questions and topic tests. |
| Teacher features | |||
Grade assessments in large batches ?Batch grading throughput matters for teacher workloads. | Strong?Bulk grading supports up to 15 submissions at once. | ?Unclear?Bulk submission specifics are not clearly documented on public pages. | ×No?No public bulk grading feature is advertised. |
Export grading results in bulk ?Exportable outputs simplify moderation and record-keeping. | Strong?Feedback outputs can be reused and shared for iteration. | ?Unclear?The public site does not clearly explain bulk result exports. | ×No?No exportable coursework-grading reports are advertised. |
Try Marksy
Marksy is made for checking several IB drafts and is rated strong for grading value, compared with no for RevisionDojo and no for Save My Exams. Current public prices: Marksy — $0 entry with 5 full gradings/month, then paid student plans from $14.99/month. RevisionDojo — Public premium pricing is high at about $198/month for full access, so it is not affordable for most students. Save My Exams — Offer-led pricing varies by region and promo with multiple monthly and annual anchors. Marksy leads 11 rows against RevisionDojo, especially Specific tips and Good price for grading drafts, and 15 rows against Save My Exams, especially IA / EE / TOK grading support and Marks by criterion.
Yes. Marksy accepts full coursework submissions for supported assignments and returns a predicted mark, comments, highlights, and a list of fixes.
Marksy checks whether the file and grading result can be read. If a check fails, it can retry safely instead of showing a broken report.
Yes. The highest plan can grade up to 15 files in one batch and export the results.
Current monthly grading limits are 5 on Free, 50 on Student, and 200 on Student Plus. Oral practice and AI checks have their own monthly limits.
Marksy uses account-scoped access controls and user data-management paths. From a product-fit perspective, this page's matrix also shows RevisionDojo vs Save My Exams at 6-2, while Marksy still leads as the practical grading-first alternative.