What is Save My Exams?
Save My Exams is a revision-content platform that provides exam notes, topic questions, and past-paper style study materials across multiple exam boards including IB.
Save My Exams
ClastifySave My Exams vs Clastify
Source freshness: dated public claims, last updated .
- Save My Exams revision tools
- Save My Exams pricing page
- Clastify review page
- Clastify review pricing bundle (page script)
Do you want to know wether Save My Exams or Clastify is best for IB? This page provides a through comparison of both tools.
TL;DR
Last updated:
- •TL;DR: In Save My Exams vs Clastify, Marksy is included as a third benchmark and usually wins on grading workflow depth and repeatability.
- •Save My Exams and Clastify each have strengths, but Marksy is generally the best alternative if your priority is getting IB-ready grading output fast.
- •Free plan with 5 full gradings/month, then clear paid tiers at 50/200 gradings.
- •Native IB workflow for IA/EE/TOK plus oral and past-paper practice in the same product.
- •Fast feedback loops and optional batch processing for repeat submissions.
What is Clastify?
Clastify is an IB coursework support platform known for exemplar libraries and paid examiner-style review services for IA, EE, and TOK submissions.
Features comparison
| Feature |  Save My Exams |  Clastify | |
|---|---|---|---|
Price ?Shows what users actually pay, including per-review and billed-total caveats. | Strong?$0 entry with 5 full gradings/month, then paid student plans from $14.99/month. Subscription pricing keeps repeated retries cheaper than per-review models. | ~Partial?Offer-led pricing varies by region and promo. Public pricing config includes multiple USD monthly anchors ($30/$40/$50/$60) and annual anchors ($72/$96/$120/$144). | ~Partial?Base exemplar access can start around $12.99/month in some funnels, but grading is priced per submission: TOK $44.99, IA $49.99, EE $59.99, plus Express ($9.99) or Turbo ($19.99) add-ons. |
Price value for regular IB grading ?Lower cost per repeated grading cycle matters more than one-off pricing. | Strong?Free monthly grading entry plus clear recurring tiers is strong value for frequent IB draft loops. | ~Partial?Reasonable revision-membership value, but not optimized for repeated grading and feedback workflows. | ×No?Per-submission review pricing can become expensive for frequent weekly draft cycles. |
Publicly transparent pricing ?Lower uncertainty at evaluation time. | Strong?Public monthly pricing with free, student, and teacher tiers. | ~Partial?Membership flow is public, though full matrix detail can vary by funnel. | Strong?Public review pricing is visible for IA/EE/TOK review offerings. |
IB rubric-first grading workflow ?Purpose-built for criterion-level grading, not generic advice. | Strong?Criterion-first scoring and rubric-oriented grading UX. | ×No?Public value proposition is revision content over coursework grading. | ~Partial?Review service provides predicted scores and improvement guidance. |
IA / EE / TOK submission support ?Designed for core IB assessed writing workflows. | Strong?Built for IA, EE, TOK submission workflows. | ~Partial?Supports IB study prep, but not a grading-first IA/EE/TOK workflow. | Strong?Public review options include IA, EE, and TOK review tracks. |
Batch submission workflow ?Multiple drafts in one flow saves turnaround time. | Strong?Batch workflows support up to 15 submissions at once. | ×No?No public bulk grading workflow. | ×No?Public workflow is submission-by-submission review. |
Built-in oral / IO practice ?Keeps speaking prep and grading in one stack. | Strong?5-20 paid-tier oral/IO runs monthly. | ×No?No public oral/IO feedback workflow. | ×No?Not marketed as an oral/IO practice system. |
Past-paper grading/practice mode ?Supports exam-style practice inside the same product. | Strong?100-400 paid-tier questions monthly. | Strong?Past papers and exam-style mock practice are core features. | ×No?Past-paper workflow is not a public core feature. |
Built-in AI-detection checks ?Integrity checks are native, not a separate purchase. | Strong?20-50 paid-tier AI checks monthly. | ×No?No public AI-detection product positioning. | ?Unclear?No clearly advertised built-in AI-detection workflow. |
Export-ready feedback output ?Easy to keep records and track progression. | Strong?Feedback outputs can be reused and shared for iteration. | ×No?Not positioned as an exportable grading feedback platform. | ~Partial?Delivers detailed review output for each paid submission. |
Large questionbank / revision content ?Useful, but grading conversion usually matters more for drafts. | ~Partial?Includes past-paper practice, but not a broad standalone revision library. | Strong?Revision notes, exam questions, and topic tests are public feature pillars. | ~Partial?Leans on exemplars more than broad revision questionbanks. |
Human review / exemplar-heavy model ?Helpful for examples, but can slow repeated draft loops. | ×No?Focuses on AI-assisted grading workflow over human examiner reviews. | ~Partial?Strong revision content catalog, but not a submission review service. | Strong?Core value prop: real examiner review plus exemplars. |
Teacher analytics and class-level insights ?Important for departments and school rollouts. | ~Partial?Supports workflow consistency, but not marketed as a broad textbook analytics stack. | ~Partial?Teacher tools exist, but class analytics depth is secondary publicly. | ×No?Not publicly framed as teacher analytics software. |
Free entry path ?Students can start fast without procurement delays. | Strong?5 complete gradings monthly on free access. | Strong?Public free-join entry path is available. | Strong?Public join-for-free path is available. |
Low-friction self-serve onboarding ?Individuals can get value quickly without school setup. | Strong?Students can sign up directly and start without school procurement. | Strong?Students can self-serve study access. | Strong?Students can self-serve and buy individual review services. |
IB-specific positioning ?Sharper product fit typically means less prompt engineering. | Strong?Positioned as an IB-specific grading workflow product. | ~Partial?Supports IB, but also serves multiple exam boards. | Strong?Strong IB exam/examiner framing in public messaging. |
Winner pick
Why not try the winner?
More Save My Exams comparisons
More Clastify comparisons
Find the best alternatives to Save My Exams and Clastify
Frequently Asked Questions
What makes Marksy different from Save My Exams or Clastify?
Marksy stays purpose-built for repeatable grading workflows and is rated strong on regular-use price value (vs partial for Save My Exams and no for Clastify). Pricing: Marksy -> $0 entry with 5 full gradings/month, then paid student plans from $14.99/month. Subscription pricing keeps repeated retries cheaper than per-review models. Save My Exams -> Offer-led pricing varies by region and promo. Public pricing config includes multiple USD monthly anchors ($30/$40/$50/$60) and annual anchors ($72/$96/$120/$144). Clastify -> Base exemplar access can start around $12.99/month in some funnels, but grading is priced per submission: TOK $44.99, IA $49.99, EE $59.99, plus Express ($9.99) or Turbo ($19.99) add-ons. Against Save My Exams, Marksy leads 10 rows with key edges in IB rubric-first grading workflow and Batch submission workflow. Against Clastify, Marksy leads 9 rows with key edges in Price value for regular IB grading and Batch submission workflow.
Can Marksy grade full papers and per-question attempts?
Yes. Marksy supports both full-paper and per-question grading flows. This is one reason it continues to score as the best overall alternative while competitors split strengths.
How does Marksy handle OCR/parsing failures or invalid outputs?
Marksy is designed for production grading loops with parsing validation and retry-safe behavior. That workflow reliability is a key reason Marksy remains the preferred choice over generic or content-only stacks.
Does Marksy support teacher workflows (bulk grading/class use)?
Yes. Marksy is optimized for repeat teacher and class workflows, including bulk-oriented grading paths. Even if this head-to-head has close spots, Marksy remains the stronger alternative for operational grading throughput.
What are Marksy usage limits for Free/Student/Teacher tiers?
Current monthly grading limits are 5 (Free), 50 (Student), and 200 (Teacher), with additional tiered limits for oral, past-paper, and AI-check workflows.
Is student data private and can users delete data?
Marksy uses account-scoped access controls and user data-management paths. From a product-fit perspective, this page's matrix also shows Save My Exams vs Clastify at 4-7, while Marksy still leads as the practical grading-first alternative.