What is Save My Exams?
Save My Exams is a revision-content platform that provides exam notes, topic questions, and past-paper style study materials across multiple exam boards including IB.
Source freshness: dated public claims, last updated .
Do you want to know wether Save My Exams or RevisionDojo is best for IB? This page provides a through comparison of both tools.
Last updated:
Save My Exams is a revision-content platform that provides exam notes, topic questions, and past-paper style study materials across multiple exam boards including IB.
RevisionDojo is an IB revision platform centered on question practice, exam prep resources, and study workflows for students preparing for IB assessments.
| Feature | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| General | |||
IB oriented ?IB-first workflows reduce prompt overhead and improve rubric fit. | Strong?Positioned as an IB-specific grading workflow product. | ~Partial?Supports IB, but also serves multiple exam boards. | Strong?Strong IB-first positioning across the homepage. |
Affordable ?Shows what users actually pay, including per-review and billed-total caveats. | Strong?$0 entry with 5 full gradings/month, then paid student plans from $14.99/month. | ~Partial?Offer-led pricing varies by region and promo with multiple monthly and annual anchors. | ×No?Public premium pricing is high at about $198/month for full access, so it is not affordable for most students. |
Has free tier ?Students can start immediately without procurement or upfront payment. | Strong?5 complete gradings monthly on free access. | Strong?Public free-join entry path is available. | ×No?Has free tier but very limited. |
Transparent pricing ?Lower uncertainty at evaluation time. | Strong?Public monthly pricing with free, student, and teacher tiers. | ?Unclear?Pricing clarity is inconsistent across funnels, so transparency remains unclear. | ×No?Prices fluctuate a lot, and is in constant discount despite being advertised as time limited. |
| Assessment grading | |||
IA / EE / TOK grading support ?Designed for core IB assessed writing workflows. | Strong?Built for IA, EE, TOK submission workflows. | ×No?No dedicated IA/EE/TOK grading support workflow is provided. | Strong?IA/EE/TOK grading support is marketed across paid workflows. |
Criterion level feedback ?Purpose-built for criterion-level grading, not generic advice. | Strong?Criterion-first scoring and rubric-oriented grading UX. | ×No?Public value proposition is revision content over coursework grading. | ~Partial?Criterion-level feedback is available but limited to paid tiers. |
AI detection ?Integrity checks are native, not a separate purchase. | Strong?20-50 paid-tier AI checks monthly. | ×No?No public AI-detection product positioning. | Strong?AI-detection checks are included in the paid grading stack. |
Specific tips ?Actionable next steps speed up draft improvement cycles. | Strong?Actionable criterion-level tips are paired with Marksy TODO tasks so feedback turns into trackable next steps. | ×No?No structured specific-tip grading workflow is offered. | ×No?No consistently structured specific-tip workflow is advertised. |
Quick ?Fast turnaround keeps revision momentum high between submissions. | Strong?Fast AI-assisted turnaround supports repeat submission loops. | ×No?Not positioned as a quick grading-feedback product. | Strong?Core paid flows are positioned around fast turnaround for iterative student feedback. |
Human review ?Human review can help edge cases but usually adds time and cost. | ×No?Focuses on AI-assisted grading workflow over human examiner reviews. | ×No?Not a human-review submission service. | ×No?No core human-review grading workflow is offered. |
Good price for assessment grading ?Lower cost per repeated grading cycle matters more than one-off pricing. | Strong?Subscription pricing keeps repeated retries cheaper than per-review models. | ×No?Pricing is built for revision memberships, not assessment grading workflows. | ×No?Assessment grading pricing is expensive at premium tiers and not good value. |
| Textbooks and simulations | |||
Online textbooks ?Useful for concept refreshers before running assessment feedback loops. | Strong?Includes online textbook-style revision content alongside grading workflows. | Strong?Revision notes, exam questions, and topic tests are public feature pillars. | Strong?Supports online subject notes and revision resources. |
Hundreds of simulations to learn concepts ?Interactive simulation depth improves understanding before drafting. | Strong?Public simulations hub includes hundreds of IB learning simulations. | ×No?No public simulations library positioned as a core offer. | ×No?No public simulation library positioned as a core feature. |
Available for free ?Free learning content removes friction for everyday revision. | Strong?Core simulation and revision resources are publicly accessible. | ~Partial?Free access exists, with deeper revision access behind paid plans. | ~Partial?Free content exists, but textbook access is limited. |
| Oral practice | |||
Practice and get feedback ?Oral practice should include structured scoring feedback. | Strong?Built-in oral practice returns structured feedback per run. | ×No?No public oral/IO feedback workflow. | Strong?Oral practice with feedback is supported in paid product workflows. |
Affordable oral practice ?Predictable oral-practice costs matter when students rehearse frequently. | Strong?Oral practice is included in plan limits, not charged per attempt. | ×No?No affordable oral-practice workflow is offered due to lack of oral support. | ×No?Oral-practice pricing is not affordable given limited structured support. |
| Questionbank | |||
Practice IB questions ?Question practice is valuable when linked to criterion-aware feedback. | ~Partial?Question practice is available through past papers only; there is no dedicated standalone questionbank. | Strong?Publicly positioned around exam questions and topic tests. | Strong?Question practice is a core value proposition. |
| Past papers | |||
Past papers available ?Past papers are a core requirement for exam-season practice. | Strong?Past-paper and exam-style practice are built into the product. | ×No?No first-party past-paper library is consistently available. | ×No?No reliable first-party past-paper library is consistently available. |
Practice past papers questions with AI ?AI-assisted past-paper feedback shortens the time between attempts. | Strong?Past-paper question feedback is AI-assisted with retry loops. | ×No?Past-paper support is content-driven, not AI practice feedback driven. | ~Partial?AI grading is mentioned, but dedicated past-paper AI workflow detail is limited. |
| Teacher features | |||
Grade assessments in large batches ?Batch grading throughput matters for teacher workloads. | Strong?Batch workflows support up to 15 submissions at once. | ×No?No public bulk grading workflow. | ?Unclear?Bulk submission specifics are not clearly documented on public pages. |
Export grading results in bulk ?Exportable outputs simplify moderation and record-keeping. | Strong?Feedback outputs can be reused and shared for iteration. | ×No?Not positioned as an exportable grading feedback platform. | ?Unclear?No clear public bulk export workflow documentation. |
Winner pick
Marksy stays purpose-built for repeatable grading workflows and is rated strong on assessment-grading price value (vs no for Save My Exams and no for RevisionDojo). Pricing: Marksy -> $0 entry with 5 full gradings/month, then paid student plans from $14.99/month. Save My Exams -> Offer-led pricing varies by region and promo with multiple monthly and annual anchors. RevisionDojo -> Public premium pricing is high at about $198/month for full access, so it is not affordable for most students. Against Save My Exams, Marksy leads 17 rows with key edges in IA / EE / TOK grading support and Criterion level feedback. Against RevisionDojo, Marksy leads 13 rows with key edges in Specific tips and Good price for assessment grading.
Yes. Marksy supports both full-paper and per-question grading flows. This is one reason it continues to score as the best overall alternative while competitors split strengths.
Marksy is designed for production grading loops with parsing validation and retry-safe behavior. That workflow reliability is a key reason Marksy remains the preferred choice over generic or content-only stacks.
Yes. Marksy is optimized for repeat teacher and class workflows, including bulk-oriented grading paths. Even if this head-to-head has close spots, Marksy remains the stronger alternative for operational grading throughput.
Current monthly grading limits are 5 (Free), 50 (Student), and 200 (Teacher), with additional tiered limits for oral, past-paper, and AI-check workflows.
Marksy uses account-scoped access controls and user data-management paths. From a product-fit perspective, this page's matrix also shows Save My Exams vs RevisionDojo at 2-7, while Marksy still leads as the practical grading-first alternative.