What is Clastify?
Clastify is known for IB example work and paid examiner-style reviews of IA, EE, and TOK submissions.
Source freshness: dated public claims, last updated .
Do you want to know wether Clastify or Revision Village is best for IB? This page provides a through comparison of both tools.
Last updated:
Clastify is known for IB example work and paid examiner-style reviews of IA, EE, and TOK submissions.
Revision Village focuses on IB question banks, worked solutions, and past-paper-style practice for core subjects.
| Feature | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| General | |||
IB oriented ?IB-specific tools need less setup than a blank chat box. | Strong?Made specifically for grading and improving IB work. | Strong?Strong IB exam/examiner framing in public messaging. | Strong?IB exam prep is the core market positioning. |
Affordable ?Shows what users actually pay, including per-review and billed-total caveats. | Strong?$0 entry with 5 full gradings/month, then paid student plans from $14.99/month. | ~Partial?Base access can start around $12.99/month, with per-submission review pricing (TOK $44.99, IA $49.99, EE $59.99). | ×No?Public Gold snapshots include subject plans at $70 monthly and higher full-suite plans. |
Has free tier ?Students can start immediately without procurement or upfront payment. | Strong?5 complete gradings monthly on free access. | ~Partial?Has free tier but very limited. | ~Partial?Open-study access exists with premium membership upsell. |
Transparent pricing ?Lower uncertainty at evaluation time. | Strong?Public monthly pricing with free, student, and teacher tiers. | Strong?Public review pricing is visible for IA/EE/TOK review offerings. | Strong?Membership and plan framing is publicly visible. |
| Coursework grading | |||
IA / EE / TOK grading support ?Made for IAs, Extended Essays, TOK, and other IB coursework. | Strong?Grades IA, EE, and TOK drafts. | Strong?Public review options include IA, EE, and TOK review tracks. | ×No?Dedicated IA, EE, and TOK grading is not advertised. |
Marks by criterion ?Criterion-by-criterion marks and feedback, not generic advice. | Strong?Shows estimated marks and feedback for each assessment criterion. | Strong?Review service provides predicted scores and criterion-linked improvement guidance. | ×No?Focused on practice content rather than grading student drafts. |
AI detection ?Integrity checks are native, not a separate purchase. | Strong?20-50 paid-tier AI checks monthly. | ×No?No built-in AI-detection check is advertised. | ×No?No public built-in AI-detection feature positioning. |
Specific tips ?A clear list shows students what to fix first. | Strong?Pairs comments with a short list of changes to make next. | ×No?Specific comments come mainly through each paid review. | ×No?No dedicated list of draft-specific fixes is advertised. |
Quick ?Fast feedback leaves time to edit and check another version. | Strong?Fast feedback leaves time to edit and check another version. | ×No?Human examiner review can take longer than instant AI-first loops. | ×No?Speed claims focus on exam practice rather than grading IA, EE, or TOK drafts. |
Human review ?Human review can help edge cases but usually adds time and cost. | ×No?Uses AI feedback rather than a human examiner review. | Strong?Core value prop: real examiner review plus exemplars. | ×No?Not positioned as a human examiner review service. |
Good price for grading drafts ?The cost of checking several drafts matters more than one review. | Strong?Subscription pricing keeps repeated retries cheaper than per-review models. | ×No?Per-submission review pricing can become expensive for frequent weekly draft cycles. | ×No?Pricing is built around revision content rather than grading drafts. |
| Textbooks and simulations | |||
Online textbooks ?Useful for understanding a topic before working on coursework. | Strong?Includes online textbook chapters as well as draft grading. | ×No?No online textbook product is offered. | ×No?No online textbook product is offered. |
Hundreds of simulations to learn concepts ?Interactive simulation depth improves understanding before drafting. | Strong?Public simulations hub includes hundreds of IB learning simulations. | ×No?No public simulations library is positioned. | ×No?No public simulation library is a core product pillar. |
Available for free ?Free learning content removes friction for everyday revision. | Strong?Core simulation and revision resources are publicly accessible. | ~Partial?Some resources are accessible with free accounts; detailed reviews are paid. | ~Partial?Some open-study access exists before premium membership upgrades. |
| Oral practice | |||
Practice and get feedback ?Oral practice should include structured scoring feedback. | Strong?Built-in oral practice returns feedback after each attempt. | ×No?Not marketed as an oral/IO practice system. | ×No?Not publicly positioned as an oral-practice feedback product. |
Affordable oral practice ?Predictable oral-practice costs matter when students rehearse frequently. | Strong?Oral practice is included in plan limits, not charged per attempt. | ×No?No oral practice feature is advertised. | ×No?No oral practice feature is advertised. |
| Questionbank | |||
Practice IB questions ?Question practice is valuable when linked to criterion-aware feedback. | ×No?No first-party questionbank is publicly offered by Marksy. | ×No?No dedicated IB question-practice bank is provided. | Strong?Strong IB questionbank and markscheme/video-solution coverage. |
| Teacher features | |||
Grade assessments in large batches ?Batch grading throughput matters for teacher workloads. | Strong?Bulk grading supports up to 15 submissions at once. | ×No?Reviews are bought one submission at a time. | ×No?No public bulk submission grading feature is advertised. |
Export grading results in bulk ?Exportable outputs simplify moderation and record-keeping. | Strong?Feedback outputs can be reused and shared for iteration. | ~Partial?Delivers detailed output per submission, but no public bulk export flow. | ×No?No public grading-result export feature is advertised. |
Try Marksy
Marksy is made for checking several IB drafts and is rated strong for grading value, compared with no for Clastify and no for Revision Village. Current public prices: Marksy — $0 entry with 5 full gradings/month, then paid student plans from $14.99/month. Clastify — Base access can start around $12.99/month, with per-submission review pricing (TOK $44.99, IA $49.99, EE $59.99). Revision Village — Public Gold snapshots include subject plans at $70 monthly and higher full-suite plans. Marksy leads 13 rows against Clastify, especially Specific tips and Good price for grading drafts, and 15 rows against Revision Village, especially IA / EE / TOK grading support and Marks by criterion.
Yes. Marksy accepts full coursework submissions for supported assignments and returns a predicted mark, comments, highlights, and a list of fixes.
Marksy checks whether the file and grading result can be read. If a check fails, it can retry safely instead of showing a broken report.
Yes. The highest plan can grade up to 15 files in one batch and export the results.
Current monthly grading limits are 5 on Free, 50 on Student, and 200 on Student Plus. Oral practice and AI checks have their own monthly limits.
Marksy uses account-scoped access controls and user data-management paths. From a product-fit perspective, this page's matrix also shows Clastify vs Revision Village at 5-1, while Marksy still leads as the practical grading-first alternative.