What is Revision Village?
Revision Village focuses on IB question banks, worked solutions, and past-paper-style practice for core subjects.
Source freshness: dated public claims, last updated .
Do you want to know wether Revision Village or Clastify is best for IB? This page provides a through comparison of both tools.
Last updated:
Revision Village focuses on IB question banks, worked solutions, and past-paper-style practice for core subjects.
Clastify is known for IB example work and paid examiner-style reviews of IA, EE, and TOK submissions.
| Feature | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| General | |||
IB oriented ?IB-specific tools need less setup than a blank chat box. | Strong?Made specifically for grading and improving IB work. | Strong?IB exam prep is the core market positioning. | Strong?Strong IB exam/examiner framing in public messaging. |
Affordable ?Shows what users actually pay, including per-review and billed-total caveats. | Strong?$0 entry with 5 full gradings/month, then paid student plans from $14.99/month. | ×No?Public Gold snapshots include subject plans at $70 monthly and higher full-suite plans. | ~Partial?Base access can start around $12.99/month, with per-submission review pricing (TOK $44.99, IA $49.99, EE $59.99). |
Has free tier ?Students can start immediately without procurement or upfront payment. | Strong?5 complete gradings monthly on free access. | ~Partial?Open-study access exists with premium membership upsell. | ~Partial?Has free tier but very limited. |
Transparent pricing ?Lower uncertainty at evaluation time. | Strong?Public monthly pricing with free, student, and teacher tiers. | Strong?Membership and plan framing is publicly visible. | Strong?Public review pricing is visible for IA/EE/TOK review offerings. |
| Coursework grading | |||
IA / EE / TOK grading support ?Made for IAs, Extended Essays, TOK, and other IB coursework. | Strong?Grades IA, EE, and TOK drafts. | ×No?Dedicated IA, EE, and TOK grading is not advertised. | Strong?Public review options include IA, EE, and TOK review tracks. |
Marks by criterion ?Criterion-by-criterion marks and feedback, not generic advice. | Strong?Shows estimated marks and feedback for each assessment criterion. | ×No?Focused on practice content rather than grading student drafts. | Strong?Review service provides predicted scores and criterion-linked improvement guidance. |
AI detection ?Integrity checks are native, not a separate purchase. | Strong?20-50 paid-tier AI checks monthly. | ×No?No public built-in AI-detection feature positioning. | ×No?No built-in AI-detection check is advertised. |
Specific tips ?A clear list shows students what to fix first. | Strong?Pairs comments with a short list of changes to make next. | ×No?No dedicated list of draft-specific fixes is advertised. | ×No?Specific comments come mainly through each paid review. |
Quick ?Fast feedback leaves time to edit and check another version. | Strong?Fast feedback leaves time to edit and check another version. | ×No?Speed claims focus on exam practice rather than grading IA, EE, or TOK drafts. | ×No?Human examiner review can take longer than instant AI-first loops. |
Human review ?Human review can help edge cases but usually adds time and cost. | ×No?Uses AI feedback rather than a human examiner review. | ×No?Not positioned as a human examiner review service. | Strong?Core value prop: real examiner review plus exemplars. |
Good price for grading drafts ?The cost of checking several drafts matters more than one review. | Strong?Subscription pricing keeps repeated retries cheaper than per-review models. | ×No?Pricing is built around revision content rather than grading drafts. | ×No?Per-submission review pricing can become expensive for frequent weekly draft cycles. |
| Textbooks and simulations | |||
Online textbooks ?Useful for understanding a topic before working on coursework. | Strong?Includes online textbook chapters as well as draft grading. | ×No?No online textbook product is offered. | ×No?No online textbook product is offered. |
Hundreds of simulations to learn concepts ?Interactive simulation depth improves understanding before drafting. | Strong?Public simulations hub includes hundreds of IB learning simulations. | ×No?No public simulation library is a core product pillar. | ×No?No public simulations library is positioned. |
Available for free ?Free learning content removes friction for everyday revision. | Strong?Core simulation and revision resources are publicly accessible. | ~Partial?Some open-study access exists before premium membership upgrades. | ~Partial?Some resources are accessible with free accounts; detailed reviews are paid. |
| Oral practice | |||
Practice and get feedback ?Oral practice should include structured scoring feedback. | Strong?Built-in oral practice returns feedback after each attempt. | ×No?Not publicly positioned as an oral-practice feedback product. | ×No?Not marketed as an oral/IO practice system. |
Affordable oral practice ?Predictable oral-practice costs matter when students rehearse frequently. | Strong?Oral practice is included in plan limits, not charged per attempt. | ×No?No oral practice feature is advertised. | ×No?No oral practice feature is advertised. |
| Questionbank | |||
Practice IB questions ?Question practice is valuable when linked to criterion-aware feedback. | ×No?No first-party questionbank is publicly offered by Marksy. | Strong?Strong IB questionbank and markscheme/video-solution coverage. | ×No?No dedicated IB question-practice bank is provided. |
| Teacher features | |||
Grade assessments in large batches ?Batch grading throughput matters for teacher workloads. | Strong?Bulk grading supports up to 15 submissions at once. | ×No?No public bulk submission grading feature is advertised. | ×No?Reviews are bought one submission at a time. |
Export grading results in bulk ?Exportable outputs simplify moderation and record-keeping. | Strong?Feedback outputs can be reused and shared for iteration. | ×No?No public grading-result export feature is advertised. | ~Partial?Delivers detailed output per submission, but no public bulk export flow. |
Try Marksy
Marksy is made for checking several IB drafts and is rated strong for grading value, compared with no for Revision Village and no for Clastify. Current public prices: Marksy — $0 entry with 5 full gradings/month, then paid student plans from $14.99/month. Revision Village — Public Gold snapshots include subject plans at $70 monthly and higher full-suite plans. Clastify — Base access can start around $12.99/month, with per-submission review pricing (TOK $44.99, IA $49.99, EE $59.99). Marksy leads 15 rows against Revision Village, especially IA / EE / TOK grading support and Marks by criterion, and 13 rows against Clastify, especially Specific tips and Good price for grading drafts.
Yes. Marksy accepts full coursework submissions for supported assignments and returns a predicted mark, comments, highlights, and a list of fixes.
Marksy checks whether the file and grading result can be read. If a check fails, it can retry safely instead of showing a broken report.
Yes. The highest plan can grade up to 15 files in one batch and export the results.
Current monthly grading limits are 5 on Free, 50 on Student, and 200 on Student Plus. Oral practice and AI checks have their own monthly limits.
Marksy uses account-scoped access controls and user data-management paths. From a product-fit perspective, this page's matrix also shows Revision Village vs Clastify at 1-5, while Marksy still leads as the practical grading-first alternative.