11.5 Evolution, Speciation and Ecosystems: Synthesis
Integrate phylogenetic, population-genetic and ecological evidence in unfamiliar IB-style scenarios.
Estimated time: 55 minutes
IB syllabus: A3.1 · A3.2 · A4.1 · B4.1 · B4.2 · D4.1 · SL and HL
Trace One Causal Chain across Scales
Begin with variation in a population. Identify whether a measured difference is heritable. Name the selection pressure or chance event, then compare survival or reproductive output. Translate that difference into a change in allele frequency. If populations are involved, ask whether gene flow connects their gene pools. If exchange remains low across generations, divergence can accumulate and reproductive barriers may evolve.
The ecological setting supplies the selective context but does not determine a unique outcome. A new resource can favor specialization, a competitor can shrink a realised niche, and a physical barrier can reduce migration. Drift may dominate in a tiny founder population, while selection becomes more repeatable when the same environmental contrast persists. Multiple mechanisms can operate, so evidence should be used to judge their relative contribution.
High-Value Distinctions
Keep these pairs separate: analogous versus homologous; habitat versus niche; fundamental versus realised niche; artificial versus natural selection; selection versus drift; allopatric versus sympatric speciation; prezygotic versus postzygotic isolation; species richness versus evenness; and cladogram topology versus branch appearance. Most difficult questions hide the tested reasoning inside one of these boundaries.
Language matters. Populations evolve; individuals are selected. Mutations arise without regard to usefulness; environments select among resulting phenotypes. A dominant allele is not necessarily frequent or beneficial. The fittest organism is the one making the greatest genetic contribution in that environment. Similarity can indicate common ancestry, but similar functions can also evolve independently.
Strategy for Data-Based Questions
For sequence tables, count differences only across homologous aligned positions and look for the smallest distances, then test whether all pairwise comparisons support one topology. For selection graphs, compare distributions before and after rather than merely locating the tallest point. For Hardy–Weinberg problems, label phenotype, genotype and allele frequencies before calculating. For transects, describe the direction and strength of association without claiming causation unless an experiment manipulated the factor.
For evaluation, identify sampling limits, alternative variables and the need for replication. A fossil series is incomplete but still informative. One gene tree may differ from the species history, so multiple loci help. A diversity index compresses community structure and should be paired with richness and abundance data. A model becomes scientifically valuable by making assumptions explicit and producing predictions that observations can challenge.
Chapter 11 in Five Connected Ideas
- Shared ancestry produces nested relationships that classifications and cladograms attempt to represent.
- Mutation and recombination generate variation; selection, drift and gene flow change its distribution.
- Speciation requires sufficiently persistent reproductive isolation between diverging gene pools.
- Abiotic tolerance and biotic interactions determine niches, distribution and community structure.
- Adaptive radiation and extinction change biodiversity across genetic, species and ecosystem levels.
Test Yourself
Two isolated populations show increasing DNA-sequence divergence, different feeding structures and reduced hybrid fertility. Which conclusion uses all three observations most appropriately?